US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.”
Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea.
“He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview.
Photo: Reuters
However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in the event that China takes military action against Taiwan.
“I don’t want to give it away — I can’t give away my secrets,” Trump said. “I don’t want to be one of these guys that tells you exactly what’s gonna happen if something happens.”
The subject of Taiwan was not discussed during his meeting with Xi on Thursday last week in South Korea, Trump said.
“People were a little surprised at that,” Trump said in the 60 Minutes interview. “He [Xi] never brought it up, because he understands it, and he understands it very well. Taiwan is a very interesting case. It’s 69 miles [111km] away from China. We’re 9,500 miles away. But that doesn’t matter. He understands what will happen.”
Hung Pu-chao (洪浦釗), deputy director of the Center for Mainland China and Regional Development Research at Tunghai University, told a forum in Taipei that Trump’s remarks were consistent with his political style, adding that his claim that Xi promised not to take military action against Taiwan during his presidency was typical Trump-style political language.
Trump sought to establish a powerful image of him that conveyed “China would not attack Taiwan by force as long as I am here,” Hung said.
The language sets an order where he plays the leading role in the Asia-Pacific situation, not only displaying his authority, but also strengthening the discourse that the US is “a stabilizing force,” he said.
Taking Taiwan by force remains the worst strategy from China’s perspective, as Chinese leaders invariably valued strategic focus, Hung said.
The most effective strategy against Taiwan is “to win without war,” meaning to trade time for space and to amass leverage over Taiwan with more pressure, he said.
China is more likely to use multiple approaches — including politics, economics, legislation and public opinion — to create a sense of “isolation and constraint” in Taiwan, undermining Taiwan’s diplomatic space and social resilience without waging a war, Hung said.
For Taiwan, the most important thing is not what Trump said or Xi promised, but to prevent itself from being used as a bargaining chip in US-China negotiations, he said.
Institute for National Policy Research executive director Wang Hung-jen (王宏仁) said the most economical strategy for China is to take Taiwan via agreements.
Xi did not mention giving up on forcefully annexing Taiwan, particularly when he talked about “Taiwanese independence forces” or external forces, Wang said.
As long as China’s ambition to “unify with” Taiwan does not change, it would be impossible for China to get rid of the idea of using military force against Taiwan and Xi would continue with his policy, he said.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) does not know whether Trump’s successor would be more supportive of Taiwan and would adjust its attitude depending on the future situation, he said, adding that what is sure is that the CCP would not abandon “unification by force.”
China would probably be more prudent during Trump’s terms simply because the cost would be too big, he added.
Beijing has failed in handling its economy and relations with Washington, and corruption in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army and national security issues have compounded its problems, Wang said.
Under such circumstances, Xi would be putting his personal power and status in the CCP at a greater risk were he to arbitrarily attack Taiwan by force, he said.
“He could be overthrown,” Wang added.
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
DETERMINATION: Beijing’s actions toward Tokyo have drawn international attention, but would likely bolster regional coordination and defense networks, the report said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration is likely to prioritize security reforms and deterrence in the face of recent “hybrid” threats from China, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said. The bureau made the assessment in a written report to the Legislative Yuan ahead of an oral report and questions-and-answers session at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The key points of Japan’s security reforms would be to reinforce security cooperation with the US, including enhancing defense deployment in the first island chain, pushing forward the integrated command and operations of the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US Forces Japan, as
IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST: Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu said the strengthening of military facilities would help to maintain security in the Taiwan Strait Japanese Minister of Defense Shinjiro Koizumi, visiting a military base close to Taiwan, said plans to deploy missiles to the post would move forward as tensions smolder between Tokyo and Beijing. “The deployment can help lower the chance of an armed attack on our country,” Koizumi told reporters on Sunday as he wrapped up his first trip to the base on the southern Japanese island of Yonaguni. “The view that it will heighten regional tensions is not accurate.” Former Japanese minister of defense Gen Nakatani in January said that Tokyo wanted to base Type 03 Chu-SAM missiles on Yonaguni, but little progress
NO CHANGES: A Japanese spokesperson said that Tokyo remains consistent and open for dialogue, while Beijing has canceled diplomatic engagements A Japanese official blasted China’s claims that Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has altered Japan’s position on a Taiwan crisis as “entirely baseless,” calling for more dialogue to stop ties between Asia’s top economies from spiraling. China vowed to take resolute self-defense against Japan if it “dared to intervene militarily in the Taiwan Strait” in a letter delivered Friday to the UN. “I’m aware of this letter,” said Maki Kobayashi, a senior Japanese government spokeswoman. “The claim our country has altered its position is entirely baseless,” she said on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Johannesburg on Saturday. The Chinese Ministry