Four days after Double Ten National Day, China announced a new round of military exercises around Taiwan titled “Joint Sword-2024B.” As the name implies, Monday’s exercises are a follow-up to its “Joint Sword-2024A” exercises in May, which were ostensibly a response to the content of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration speech, but, as the title suggests, were intended to routinize large-scale military exercises around Taiwan.
International observers in general viewed Lai’s National Day speech as restrained and measured.
“Lai’s speech demonstrated restraint, refraining from breaking new ground, repeating well-known positions,” Council on Foreign Relations research fellow David Sacks said.
These exercises raise the question of what is driving Beijing’s repeated escalations and what it hopes to achieve, as it is clear that it is not in response to anything Lai says. Beijing has clearly switched up its strategy toward Taiwan this year by ramping up pressure on the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration, as it knows that with the opposition having a majority in the legislature — led by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — it can pressure the leadership from within Taiwan’s political system.
China has been “slowly, but surely” increasing the pressure around the nation, normalizing patrols and regularly encircling Taiwan by air and sea, Navy Commander Admiral Tang Hua (唐華) told The Economist last week.
Beijing wagers that increasing pressure on Taiwan would undermine social cohesion and resilience, and would spur opposition politicians to increase criticism and hostility toward the government, breaking down political functioning. While fundamentally these exercises are a result of Beijing’s political weakness and a reminder that its strategy of winning Taiwanese hearts and minds has failed, they presage a more dangerous future.
Beijing appears to favor there not even being an uneasy strategic equilibrium between the two sides in the Taiwan Strait. It is attempting to alter the “status quo,” providing its military with training while doing so. It is now more important than ever for the international community to help shore up deterrence against Chinese military aggression.
China’s exercises are providing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) with training at the tactical and operational level to impose a quarantine or blockade.
“[The PLA is] simulating how to cut off Taiwan’s air and sea traffic to the outside world and prevent Taiwan’s naval and air forces from being mobilized,” Association of Strategic Foresight research fellow Chieh Chung (揭仲) said.
These also have a significant psychological component, as it makes it harder for Taiwanese forces to detect when Beijing would switch from exercises to war, Tang said.
“Their capacity to switch from exercises to war is really strengthening,” one senior official told the Financial Times on Thursday.
Beijing’s escalation should be a wake-up call to Taiwanese society, DPP Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) said on Thursday.
“Indifference to large-scale military drills undermines Taiwan’s security,” Chen said. “China’s military exercises are not just meant to make Taiwanese people feel anxious or worried, but rather to desensitize us.”
These exercises should spur society to boost civil defense preparedness, he said, adding that “it is not just about being aware of the drills, but knowing how to act if they escalate into conflict.”
It is important for society to come together and firmly convey to China that its attempts to divide Taiwanese society are a political dead end. It also highlights the importance of freedom of navigation of the US and allied countries to prevent Chinese attempts to impose control over international waters and airspace.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS