Four days after Double Ten National Day, China announced a new round of military exercises around Taiwan titled “Joint Sword-2024B.” As the name implies, Monday’s exercises are a follow-up to its “Joint Sword-2024A” exercises in May, which were ostensibly a response to the content of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration speech, but, as the title suggests, were intended to routinize large-scale military exercises around Taiwan.
International observers in general viewed Lai’s National Day speech as restrained and measured.
“Lai’s speech demonstrated restraint, refraining from breaking new ground, repeating well-known positions,” Council on Foreign Relations research fellow David Sacks said.
These exercises raise the question of what is driving Beijing’s repeated escalations and what it hopes to achieve, as it is clear that it is not in response to anything Lai says. Beijing has clearly switched up its strategy toward Taiwan this year by ramping up pressure on the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration, as it knows that with the opposition having a majority in the legislature — led by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — it can pressure the leadership from within Taiwan’s political system.
China has been “slowly, but surely” increasing the pressure around the nation, normalizing patrols and regularly encircling Taiwan by air and sea, Navy Commander Admiral Tang Hua (唐華) told The Economist last week.
Beijing wagers that increasing pressure on Taiwan would undermine social cohesion and resilience, and would spur opposition politicians to increase criticism and hostility toward the government, breaking down political functioning. While fundamentally these exercises are a result of Beijing’s political weakness and a reminder that its strategy of winning Taiwanese hearts and minds has failed, they presage a more dangerous future.
Beijing appears to favor there not even being an uneasy strategic equilibrium between the two sides in the Taiwan Strait. It is attempting to alter the “status quo,” providing its military with training while doing so. It is now more important than ever for the international community to help shore up deterrence against Chinese military aggression.
China’s exercises are providing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) with training at the tactical and operational level to impose a quarantine or blockade.
“[The PLA is] simulating how to cut off Taiwan’s air and sea traffic to the outside world and prevent Taiwan’s naval and air forces from being mobilized,” Association of Strategic Foresight research fellow Chieh Chung (揭仲) said.
These also have a significant psychological component, as it makes it harder for Taiwanese forces to detect when Beijing would switch from exercises to war, Tang said.
“Their capacity to switch from exercises to war is really strengthening,” one senior official told the Financial Times on Thursday.
Beijing’s escalation should be a wake-up call to Taiwanese society, DPP Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) said on Thursday.
“Indifference to large-scale military drills undermines Taiwan’s security,” Chen said. “China’s military exercises are not just meant to make Taiwanese people feel anxious or worried, but rather to desensitize us.”
These exercises should spur society to boost civil defense preparedness, he said, adding that “it is not just about being aware of the drills, but knowing how to act if they escalate into conflict.”
It is important for society to come together and firmly convey to China that its attempts to divide Taiwanese society are a political dead end. It also highlights the importance of freedom of navigation of the US and allied countries to prevent Chinese attempts to impose control over international waters and airspace.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS