An executive from a large technology firm on Thursday won a Nobel prize. The top prize for chemistry went to the head of Alphabet Inc’s artificial intelligence (AI) efforts, Demis Hassabis, along with two other key scientists, for a years-long project that used AI to predict the structure of proteins. The day before, Geoffrey Hinton, a former executive at Google who has been called a godfather of AI, won the Nobel Prize in Physics along with physicist John Hopfield, for work on machine learning.
It seems the Nobel Foundation is eager to mark AI advancements — and the notion that key scientific problems can be solved computationally — as worthy of its coveted prizes. That would be a reputational boon for firms like Google and executives like Hassabis. However, there is a risk, too, that such recognition obscures concerns about both the technology itself and the increasing concentration of AI power in a handful of companies.
Hassabis himself has long craved this accolade, having told staff for years that that he wanted DeepMind, the AI lab he cofounded and sold to Google in 2015, to win between three and five Nobel prizes over the next decade.
At a news conference on Wednesday, he called the award “an unbelievable honor of a lifetime” and said he had been hoping to win it this time around.
Indeed, he initially shaped DeepMind as a research lab with utopian objectives, where many of its leading scientists worked on building AI systems to help cure diseases like cancer or solve global warming.
However, that humanitarian agenda faded to the background after the sale to Google and especially after the release of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, which sparked a race among tech giants to deploy chatbot-style technology to businesses and consumers.
DeepMind has since become more product-focused (information about its healthcare and climate efforts disappeared from its homepage, for example), although it has continued with health-related efforts like AlphaFold. Out of DeepMind’s roughly 1,500-strong workforce, a team of just two dozen people were running the protein-folding project when it reached a critical milestone in 2020, according to a video documentary about the effort.
The Nobel will surely give Hassabis a credibility boost at Alphabet, where he has been leading the company’s fraught efforts to keep up with OpenAI. Google’s flagship AI model Gemini has grappled with controversies over its frequent mistakes and the possibility it would choke off traffic to the rest of the Web. Now perhaps a smoother path has been paved for Hassabis if he wants to become Alphabet’s next chief executive.
The former chess champion is a consummate strategist and rivals Sam Altman as the world’s most successful builder of AI technology, having pushed the boundaries of fields like deep learning, reinforcement learning and games-based models such as AlphaGo, which beat world champion go players eight years ago. Hassabis was already talking about taking on protein folding during those matches.
The glow benefits Google, too. Recent challenges from antitrust regulators over monopolistic behavior have not helped its reputation as a company founded on the principle of “don’t be evil.” Now with two Nobel prizes linked to work done by its scientists, the tech giant can more easily frame itself as providing services that are ultimately good for society, as its lawyers have been arguing, and perhaps generate goodwill more broadly with the public and regulators.
However, we should not forget the tension between the high-minded goals professed by Big Tech and what their businesses are really focused on. Google, which derives close to 80 percent of its revenue from advertising, is now putting ads into its new AI search tool. For businesses, that invites a new layer of complexity to online advertising, while consumers face the prospect of wading through AI-generated information that Google is trying to monetize, and which could one day become more biased toward advertisers.
Remember also that Google’s prioritization of human well-being was called into question less than three years ago when it fired two leading AI ethics experts who had warned about the risks that its AI models could entrench bias, spread misinformation and hoard energy, issues that have not gone away. A study in Nature last month, for instance, showed that AI tools like ChatGPT were making racist decisions about people based on their dialect.
The Nobel Prize is designed to recognize people who have made outstanding contributions to science, humanism and peace, so the foundation behind it has taken a bold stance in validating the work of AI and of one company in particular. The award to Hassabis — like the Nobel Peace Prize given to Barack Obama one year after he was elected as US president — feels a little premature. It is still unclear what kind of broad, real-world impact DeepMind’s protein-folding project will have on the medical field and drug discovery.
Let us hope the prize motivates well-endowed technology firms to invest much more in using AI for public service efforts like protein folding and in AI ethics research — and does not muddy the debate over the very real risks that AI poses to the world, too.
Parmy Olson is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology. A former reporter for the Wall Street Journal and Forbes, she is author of We Are Anonymous.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Ahead of US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) meeting today on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea, an op-ed published in Time magazine last week maliciously called President William Lai (賴清德) a “reckless leader,” stirring skepticism in Taiwan about the US and fueling unease over the Trump-Xi talks. In line with his frequent criticism of the democratically elected ruling Democratic Progressive Party — which has stood up to China’s hostile military maneuvers and rejected Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework — Lyle Goldstein, Asia engagement director at the US think tank Defense Priorities, called
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS