To promote the use of renewable energy sources, the government allows developers to turn agricultural land into solar farms, but the policy has been criticized for reducing the availability of fertile land.
The National Property Administration has approved a 600 hectare plot of agricultural land in Changhua County’s Fangyuan Township (芳苑) to be developed by five solar energy companies Farmers are protesting the decision.
In 2022, the proportion of energy generated from sustainable sources in Japan reached almost 25 percent. Solar capacity accounted for more than 10 percent of the total at 85 gigawatts, which was behind only China and the US.
There is “coopetition” — competitive cooperation — between the agriculture and solar power sectors for the use of land amid the energy transition in Japan, and there are concerns that solar panels might harm crops.
However, years of experimentation and implementation have proved that crops can grow well as long as solar farms are well designed. More than 50 kinds of fruits and vegetables had no problem in the experiments.
Tokyo has designed two pathways of energy transition: One is to permanently change the use of farmland to generating solar power; the other is to allow farming and solar generation to coexist.
Even given the small scale of power generation, the latter is considered more popular, as it creates value in agricultural landscapes, bringing them back to life and attracting young people to return to their hometowns.
This makes it a win-win situation for farmers and solar firms.
Taiwan’s nuclear-free homeland policy and the goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 have driven the development of green energy. Solar panels are scattered across farmlands and fish ponds after the rapid expansion of solar projects.
Although this has contributed significantly to the efficiency of the power supply, it comes at a cost: sacrificing agricultural development, and worsening the self-sufficiency rate for grain production.
Striking a balance is the key to a win-win situation.
Dino Wei is an engineer.
Translated by Fion Khan
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Ahead of US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) meeting today on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea, an op-ed published in Time magazine last week maliciously called President William Lai (賴清德) a “reckless leader,” stirring skepticism in Taiwan about the US and fueling unease over the Trump-Xi talks. In line with his frequent criticism of the democratically elected ruling Democratic Progressive Party — which has stood up to China’s hostile military maneuvers and rejected Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework — Lyle Goldstein, Asia engagement director at the US think tank Defense Priorities, called
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.