To promote the use of renewable energy sources, the government allows developers to turn agricultural land into solar farms, but the policy has been criticized for reducing the availability of fertile land.
The National Property Administration has approved a 600 hectare plot of agricultural land in Changhua County’s Fangyuan Township (芳苑) to be developed by five solar energy companies Farmers are protesting the decision.
In 2022, the proportion of energy generated from sustainable sources in Japan reached almost 25 percent. Solar capacity accounted for more than 10 percent of the total at 85 gigawatts, which was behind only China and the US.
There is “coopetition” — competitive cooperation — between the agriculture and solar power sectors for the use of land amid the energy transition in Japan, and there are concerns that solar panels might harm crops.
However, years of experimentation and implementation have proved that crops can grow well as long as solar farms are well designed. More than 50 kinds of fruits and vegetables had no problem in the experiments.
Tokyo has designed two pathways of energy transition: One is to permanently change the use of farmland to generating solar power; the other is to allow farming and solar generation to coexist.
Even given the small scale of power generation, the latter is considered more popular, as it creates value in agricultural landscapes, bringing them back to life and attracting young people to return to their hometowns.
This makes it a win-win situation for farmers and solar firms.
Taiwan’s nuclear-free homeland policy and the goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 have driven the development of green energy. Solar panels are scattered across farmlands and fish ponds after the rapid expansion of solar projects.
Although this has contributed significantly to the efficiency of the power supply, it comes at a cost: sacrificing agricultural development, and worsening the self-sufficiency rate for grain production.
Striking a balance is the key to a win-win situation.
Dino Wei is an engineer.
Translated by Fion Khan
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS