When Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD opened its first Southeast Asian factory in Thailand earlier this month, the nation of 66 million people basked in the limelight and won praise for its industrial vision.
However, what received less attention was an announcement by another big automobile manufacturer — Suzuki Motor — just a few weeks earlier that it would shutter a Thai factory that produced about 60,000 cars a year.
The Japanese automaker’s move mirrors those by scores of other companies in Southeast Asia’s second-biggest economy which is bearing the brunt of cheap imports from China and a slide in industrial competitiveness due to factors including rising energy prices and an aging workforce.
Thailand has witnessed nearly 2,000 factory closures in the last year, upending its manufacturing sector which contributes nearly one-quarter of its GDP.
It is weighing on the US$500 billion economy and on workers such as Chanpen Suetrong.
The 54-year-old spent nearly two decades at the VMC Safety Glass factory in central Samut Prakan Province, checking the automotive and building products that rolled off the production line.
Chanpen said she was unexpectedly told in April that the factory was shutting down, leaving her without a job.
“I don’t have any savings. I have hundreds of thousands of baht of debt,” said the sole breadwinner in a family of three that includes an ailing husband and a teenage daughter. “I’m old, where will I go to work? Who will hire me?”
Monchai Praepriwngam, a director at VMC Safety Glass, declined to comment on why the factory closed.
The manufacturing sector’s woes have left Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, who took power last year, struggling to fulfill his promise of bringing average annual GDP growth to 5 percent over his four-year term, up from 1.73 percent in the past decade.
“The industrial sector has slumped and capacity utilization has fallen below 60 percent,” Srettha told parliament last week. “It is clear that the industry needs to adapt.”
Supavud Saicheua, chairman of the state planning agency National Economic and Social Development Council, said Thailand’s decades-long manufacturing-driven economic model is broken.
“The Chinese are now trying to export left, right and center. Those cheap imports are really causing trouble,” Supavud said.
“You have to change,” Supavud said, adding that Thailand should refocus on making products that China was not exporting while strengthening its agriculture sector. “No ifs or buts.”
The factory closures between July last year and June increased 40 percent from the preceding 12 months, the latest Thai Department of Industrial Works data showed.
As a result, job losses jumped by 80 percent during the same period, with more than 51,500 workers left without work, the data shows.
The number of new factory openings has also slowed down, with large factories closing and small factories opening instead, Kiatnakin Phatra Bank’s research division said in a note last month.
The impact has spread to industries that are the main driving force of the economy, including the automobile industry, it said.
Meanwhile, smaller manufacturers are grappling with a rise in production costs on the back of steepening energy prices and relatively high wages, Federation of Thai SME chairman Sangchai Theerakulwanich said.
“We compete with multinational businesses,” he said. “Manufacturers unable to adapt quickly had to close business or change to make something else.”
Starting this month, Thailand is collecting a 7 percent VAT on cheap imported goods priced less than 1,500 baht (US$42), mostly from China, but such products are still exempted from customs duties.
Federation of Thai Industries vice chairman Nava Chantanasurakon said his group has asked the government to look at measures to prevent tariff evasion amid the US-China trade dispute and high barriers for some Chinese goods in other regions.
For now, Thailand’s economy is projected to grow only about 2.5 percent this year — among the factors that have left a majority of Thais dissatisfied with Srettha’s performance.
Srettha has said that his party’s controversial and delayed 500 billion baht handout scheme that has met a barrage of criticism —including from the central bank — is essential: “It will be strong medicine to revive the economy.”
Without a steady income, Chanpen said she was waiting for the 10,000 baht handout that 50 million Thais would be eligible to receive under the plan.
“The economy was bad during the previous government, but even after the new government has come, the economy is still as bad as before,” she said.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS