Considering the yen’s value these days, visitors to Japan are probably spending their cash so quickly that they are not stopping to examine it too carefully.
However, its banknotes say a surprising amount about the country. On Wednesday, for the first time in four decades, Japan is to get an entirely new series of bills featuring a trio of 19th and early 20th-century intellectual and cultural titans.
The world’s most traded currencies have little new to say. The familiar faces on US dollar bills have not changed in a century. The euro, reflecting the compromise inherent in its origin, not only shuns people, but even real places, featuring instead fictional bridges and buildings. The UK’s new notes have 75-year-old King Charles III; China’s renminbi still depicts Chairman Mao Zedong (毛澤東). The Swiss franc once portrayed local personalities such as the architect Le Corbusier, but has recently opted for more generic hands, globes and Alpine landscapes.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
However, the yen still tells a story about the modern country it serves. Today’s notes are the first redesign in 20 years, introducing three new portraits: “father of Japanese capitalism” Eiichi Shibusawa; pioneering educator and women’s rights activist Umeko Tsuda; and groundbreaking microbiologist Shibasaburo Kitasato.
Why these three? Politicians have appeared on notes in the past, but in recent years the preference has been for famous figures from the Meiji era (1868-1912), when modern Japan was formed. Serial businessman Shibusawa is on the ￥10,000 bill. He may have founded Japan’s first joint-stock corporation, introduced modern accounting to the country and helped form about 500 companies, including Tokyo Gas Co, Oji Holdings Corp, the predecessor of Mizuho Bank, and the forerunners of brewers Kirin and Sapporo, but he was no cutthroat capitalist.
He believed that morality and the economy were inseparable — one was needed for the other — and that profits should come second to public interest. He wrote that wealth must be sustainable and that its broader creation to benefit society should not just be the role of the government, but also of the private sector — believing that affluence itself would itself improve morality. His philosophy is a forerunner of today’s ethical investing and still informs the ideal of the country’s capitalism.
In a curious quirk of timing, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida is believed to be a fan. Kishida incorporated much of this thinking in his “New Capitalism” framework announced at the beginning of his term and one of his early allies was Shibusawa’s descendant, Ken Shibusawa.
On the ￥5,000 note is Umeko Tsuda. Her predecessor on the bill, writer Ichiyo Higuchi, was the first woman to have her portrait on Japan’s modern banknotes. Tsuda is an obvious successor, credited as the first Japanese woman to study overseas.
She left the country at the age of six, as one of five young girls accompanying the Iwakura Mission, a fact-finding journey of more than 100 academics aimed at modernizing the nation with western advances (which Shibusawa also joined). She stayed in the US for a decade. Then, unhappy with her prospects in Japan, she returned to attend Bryn Mawr College near Philadelphia. Tsuda was published in British academic journals and became a pioneering educator and advocate for women’s education and rights. She founded what is now Tsuda University, which would later educate generations of women who became pioneering lawyers, cabinet ministers and diplomats.
Lastly, on the ￥1,000 bill is Shibasaburo Kitasato, a microbiologist who discovered the bacteria that cause tetanus and the bubonic plague. Studying in Japan under a Dutch doctor and then moving to Berlin to learn from the world’s best, he likely should have won the Nobel Prize for his work on antitoxins. He was cruelly denied for reasons that remain unclear. Some charitably assume it to be because the committee had not yet begun the practice of sharing prizes among more than one person, while others suspect turn-of-the-century racism against Asians.
The nation of today can continue to learn from the experiences of the three. The first takeaway is the value of exposure to new ideas. The trio had formative international education, assimilating what was then-cutting-edge knowledge before bringing it back home. Today, the number of Japanese studying overseas is falling, and had already started to plateau before the COVID-19 pandemic and the weak yen. Authorities should learn from the trio’s experience and double down on efforts to reverse that trend.
Secondly, create things. When Japan’s economic bubble burst in the early 1990s, the culture of graduates favoring working at safe, large corporations became entrenched. In recent years that is just beginning to unwind: Let these lessons accelerate that trend.
Tsuda’s women’s school would become a prestigious university. Kitasato created a pioneering center for infectious disease research and co-founded what would become today’s US$24 billion maker of medical devices, Terumo Corp. Shibusawa left the safety of the Ministry of Finance to become a serial founder and proto-venture capitalist, setting up institutions including the Tokyo Stock Exchange in the process.
Finally, it is never too late to change. Tsuda did not get to attend university until her mid-20s and was well into her 30s by the time she founded her school. In his youth, Shibusawa threw in with anti-foreign extremist views, but later became one of the staunchest proponents of bringing western thought to Japan. Today, the country is becoming more receptive to different paths to success, but the fear of following the wrong path still persists.
Wealth, health, education and advocacy: Youth in the Japan of today can find much to learn from this trio — assuming, of course, they are not reaching for their cashless payment-equipped smartphones instead.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia and was Tokyo deputy bureau chief.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS