The Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times), and other news media have carried reports about a Taiwanese political talk show being “shadowed” by “red” (Chinese communist) media.
The reports say that a correspondent of China’s state-run Xinhua news agency in Taiwan sat in the TV studio and monitored the production of the program.
They say that Xinhua had a significant influence on the TV station’s political talk show, including the themes and scenarios of discussions, and that the guests and pundits invited to the program were picked or vetted by the Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) of the Chinese State Council.
The National Communications Commission (NCC) quickly responded to these reports by saying that it was investigating which TV station was involved, and that if the station is found to have contravened the regulations, it would be fined up to NT$2 million (US$61,482) and be taken off the air.
If the reports are true, this is a major case of interference in Taiwan’s press. It would mean the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is reaching into Taiwanese political talk shows to conduct brainwashing and promote unification by means of “using Taiwanese to control Taiwanese.”
Taiwan, as a democratic country, has the characteristics of diversity and openness. However, a reporter of Xinhua directing a Taiwanese political talk show means that the media of democratic Taiwan is being infiltrated by authoritarian China.
Authoritarian political systems have always regarded the media as propaganda tools. Xinhua is directly subordinate to the CCP’s Publicity Department, meaning that it takes its orders from the party.
In the past, the TAO had offered business opportunities to Taiwanese TV stations in the hope of inducing them to produce political talk shows that critique the Democratic Progressive Party and other “pan-green” forces.
Up until now, all such dealings have been conducted overseas, but now a Chinese reporter is reported to have taken part in the production and broadcast of a talk show in Taiwan.
Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that this case shows the importance of the NCC, and he called on the Legislative Yuan to pass a proposal that would give the commission the power to approve broadcasters’ personnel.
This latest incident should be promptly investigated and strictly dealt with, using the state’s authority to prevent Taiwan’s hard-won press freedom from being destroyed by authoritarian China’s infiltration.
Knight Chang is a political worker.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS