The nation’s traffic problems seem to have lingered for many years, and public dissatisfaction is growing louder. From persistently high numbers of traffic accident casualties to inconveniences for pedestrians and poorly maintained road surfaces, there are major problems for everyone.
It is well known that Taiwan’s roads are quite unfriendly to pedestrians, even earning the label “pedestrian hell” in foreign media.
Sidewalk planning is inadequate, arcades are cluttered with obstacles and occupied by scooters, and vehicles of different sizes all travel together. Especially in bustling urban areas, walking requires constant vigilance.
Furthermore, potholes and patched roads are everywhere, not only affecting driving comfort, but also increasing accident risks. Compared with neighboring countries like Japan, Taiwan lacks sufficient efforts in this regard.
Behind the public grievances lie many deep problems that require repeated examination. For a long time, Taiwan’s traffic safety education and promotions have been glaringly insufficient, leading to a lack of awareness of law among the public. Whether it is pedestrians jaywalking or drivers recklessly cutting across traffic, it reflects the general public’s inadequate understanding of the issue.
At the same time, some have questioned loopholes in the driver’s license system. The examination standards are too simple, and the training is a mere formality, unable to simulate real conditions. Considering a large time gap for license renewals, it is doubtful whether the evaluation of drivers’ abilities is sufficiently thorough.
Members of the public also frequently criticize road design in Taiwan. For instance, excessively wide shoulders encourage illegal parking, and improper traffic segregation leads to mixed vehicle-pedestrian flows, forcing drivers to violate rules. These designs are clearly not human-centric.
The public has called on the government to thoroughly review the situation and promote comprehensive reforms. Whether it is education, licensing, enforcement or facility planning, authorities should re-examine past practices, tackle root causes and collaborate across all sectors.
On the part of the public, there is a need to self-reflect on habits, and to advocate for a friendly and trusting traffic culture.
As someone who has commuted between Tainan and Kaohsiung by scooter for many years, I often face dangerous situations, such as other drivers cutting me off, illegal parking blocking the road, not stopping at a red light, and even getting honked at for driving carefully and allegedly obstructing traffic — it is truly distressing.
Despite authorities’ efforts in improving signal systems and adding scooter lanes, the road to reform remains arduous, and unilateral actions alone cannot achieve comprehensive results. To improve the situation, the government must continue its efforts, while the public also contributes to a solution, with mutual understanding and respect.
Most people have tried at some point to dangerously speed up and weave through traffic to save time. However, after experiencing a serious accident involving family members, I realized the importance of safe driving.
I hope for a day when we no longer have to risk our lives on the road just to get around. If the government and the public fight side by side, they can definitely untangle this long-standing chaos, and create a safe and orderly traffic, allowing everyone in Taiwan to experience every journey in comfort.
Wang Yi-chieh is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS