The nation’s traffic problems seem to have lingered for many years, and public dissatisfaction is growing louder. From persistently high numbers of traffic accident casualties to inconveniences for pedestrians and poorly maintained road surfaces, there are major problems for everyone.
It is well known that Taiwan’s roads are quite unfriendly to pedestrians, even earning the label “pedestrian hell” in foreign media.
Sidewalk planning is inadequate, arcades are cluttered with obstacles and occupied by scooters, and vehicles of different sizes all travel together. Especially in bustling urban areas, walking requires constant vigilance.
Furthermore, potholes and patched roads are everywhere, not only affecting driving comfort, but also increasing accident risks. Compared with neighboring countries like Japan, Taiwan lacks sufficient efforts in this regard.
Behind the public grievances lie many deep problems that require repeated examination. For a long time, Taiwan’s traffic safety education and promotions have been glaringly insufficient, leading to a lack of awareness of law among the public. Whether it is pedestrians jaywalking or drivers recklessly cutting across traffic, it reflects the general public’s inadequate understanding of the issue.
At the same time, some have questioned loopholes in the driver’s license system. The examination standards are too simple, and the training is a mere formality, unable to simulate real conditions. Considering a large time gap for license renewals, it is doubtful whether the evaluation of drivers’ abilities is sufficiently thorough.
Members of the public also frequently criticize road design in Taiwan. For instance, excessively wide shoulders encourage illegal parking, and improper traffic segregation leads to mixed vehicle-pedestrian flows, forcing drivers to violate rules. These designs are clearly not human-centric.
The public has called on the government to thoroughly review the situation and promote comprehensive reforms. Whether it is education, licensing, enforcement or facility planning, authorities should re-examine past practices, tackle root causes and collaborate across all sectors.
On the part of the public, there is a need to self-reflect on habits, and to advocate for a friendly and trusting traffic culture.
As someone who has commuted between Tainan and Kaohsiung by scooter for many years, I often face dangerous situations, such as other drivers cutting me off, illegal parking blocking the road, not stopping at a red light, and even getting honked at for driving carefully and allegedly obstructing traffic — it is truly distressing.
Despite authorities’ efforts in improving signal systems and adding scooter lanes, the road to reform remains arduous, and unilateral actions alone cannot achieve comprehensive results. To improve the situation, the government must continue its efforts, while the public also contributes to a solution, with mutual understanding and respect.
Most people have tried at some point to dangerously speed up and weave through traffic to save time. However, after experiencing a serious accident involving family members, I realized the importance of safe driving.
I hope for a day when we no longer have to risk our lives on the road just to get around. If the government and the public fight side by side, they can definitely untangle this long-standing chaos, and create a safe and orderly traffic, allowing everyone in Taiwan to experience every journey in comfort.
Wang Yi-chieh is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS