The superpower’s engineers and soldiers waded into the waves lapping at the Mediterranean shoreline and tethered their pontoons to form a sort of pier, eventually to become a bridge, but a storm wrecked the pier and delayed the superpower’s plans. Those ultimately turned out to be doomed anyway.
You are probably recognizing the start of Herodotus’ account of the Persian attempt to cross the Hellespont in 480 BC. I could not help but think of it when a storm recently buffeted and disabled the pier that the US was building on the coast of the Gaza Strip.
Within weeks of that setback, the Americans, like the Persians of yore, rebuilt their floating structure, but it is still not being used the way it was intended.
Cindy McCain, widow of the former US senator and head of the UN World Food Programme, said this week that it is not safe to unload humanitarian provisions there, after rockets hit nearby warehouses and injured staff. That also means the US Agency for International Development, which coordinates with the UN World Food Programme, is pausing its efforts.
The floating pier was an idea that US President Joe Biden announced in his State of the Union address in March. He gave that speech five months to the day after Hamas massacred Israelis in the worst slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust, and almost as long after Israel began bombing the entire Gaza Strip into rubble, while often hindering the humanitarian aid meant to succor its 2 million civilians.
Throughout that time and the three months since, Biden has not been able to change the situation for the better. To his credit, he has kept the conflict from spreading into a regional war between the US and Iran, but he has not deployed the full power of the Oval Office to restrain or guide the Israeli government, nor to lean on both Hamas and Israel, via their intermediaries, to agree to a ceasefire that would free the hostages and prepare the eventual reconstruction of the Gaza Strip.
Pleasing neither side, Biden has instead resorted to largely symbolic half-measures. When the Israelis held up aid supplies on land, he ordered a few loads to be dropped by parachute. When they kept dropping tunnel busters, he blocked one shipment of the most explosive bombs going to Israel, while continuing to supply it with all the other weapons that the US gives Israel.
This week, in what must pass for a diplomatic win, Biden finally pushed a US-drafted resolution through the UN Security Council. It calls on Hamas and Israel to accept a ceasefire agreement that Biden recently sketched out, but its language was diluted enough to satisfy few and offend many, while not necessarily bringing peace any closer.
The most tangible symbol for US fecklessness is that pier. When I first heard Biden describe it during the State of the Union address, I thought of other heroic US feats of logistics. During the Berlin airlift of 1948 to 1949, for example, the Americans and their British allies fed half a city for almost a year, at the risk of sparking World War III, until the adversary yielded in the face of such awe-inspiring resolve.
Biden’s pier operation, by contrast, is well-meant and ambitious, though hardly on the epic scale of 1948 (or 480 BC). Massive amounts of victuals and medicine first go to Cyprus, then to an offshore platform where they are reloaded onto vessels to the pier. From there, they are meant to travel by truck, under UN supervision, throughout the Gaza Strip.
That is the theory, at least. In practice, only a few dollops have arrived in Gaza, often to be looted. During the brief time the pier was working before the storm, about 27 trucks a day left from it, with planning for 150; the Gaza Strip apparently needs at least 600 a day to escape famine. This pier is hardly the humanitarian equivalent of a D-Day beachhead.
As Herodotus told his anecdote about the Persian setback, King Xerxes, who was on the way to conquering the Greeks, was so full of hubris that he gave orders to whip the Hellespont’s waves with 300 lashes and to scald the water with hot irons as punishment. The sea was unimpressed, and Xerxes, as Herodotus’ audience understood, already doomed.
The US, as a long-in-the-tooth superpower, also succumbs to hubris from time to time, thinking that it can or should solve every problem. Unlike Xerxes, though, Biden yearns to use whatever remains of his nation’s power for good. It is just that he keeps learning that the world and its many hatreds, like the Hellespont, will not be tamed, by him or any US president.
At worst, Biden’s pier, long before it does any good, becomes a target for the region’s terrorist groups, drawing the US deeper into the fighting. At best, the pier operates for a while longer with negligible impact, until it becomes irrelevant once Israel and some outside coalition of custodian powers restore adequate humanitarian access by land.
Herodotus’ story moved his audiences because they knew what came next: The Persians lost, and on their way home discovered that their rebuilt bridge was in ruins yet again. The Achaemenid Dynasty began its decline; one-and-a-half centuries later, Alexander the Great crossed the Hellespont in the other direction and dissolved the Persian Empire.
The US is not, or not yet, in danger of such a fate, but Biden and his successors would do well to accept that Washington cannot solve every problem and must choose judiciously where and how to intervene, and then with full commitment rather than symbolic gestures.
Xerxes, incidentally, had no good reason to be in Greece at all. Whenever the current conflict in the Middle East winds down, the US might do well to leave that region and stay gone.
Andreas Kluth is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering US diplomacy, national security and geopolitics. Previously, he was editor-in-chief of Handelsblatt Global and a writer for The Economist. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS