Taiwan has seen a big change in how people view marriage, especially among Generation Z. As a member of this generation, I have observed a shift in how we perceive love, commitment and personal fulfillment.
My desire to share my views on marriage stems from Taiwan’s progress in marriage equality and social advancement. In 2019, Taiwan became the first Asian country to legalize same-sex marriage, making it increasingly friendly toward same-sex relationships.
Even though I could not vote in the referendum at that time, I still feel very proud because I know this journey was not easy. It followed years of protests, legal battles and advocacy efforts by the LGBTQ+ community and their allies. This milestone made me start thinking about what the true essence of marriage really is.
Growing up in Taiwan, I have seen the clash between traditional values and modern ideals play out in my own life and those of my peers. The pressure to conform to societal expectations of marriage and family life is obvious, yet many of us are questioning whether these conventions truly meet our personal desires and aspirations.
For me, the notion of marriage as a symbol of success or fulfillment feels outdated and restrictive. I believe that true happiness comes from pursuing our passions, nurturing personal growth and forming genuine connections with others — whether or not marriage is part of the picture.
The economic realities we face only worsen these tensions. With property prices soaring and job stability being uncertain, it is understandable that many people see the traditional concept of marrying early and starting a family as less feasible and less attractive. Some of my friends are focusing on their jobs and personal growth instead of thinking about marriage in the traditional sense. They think that having financial stability and feeling fulfilled personally are the most important things.
Additionally, the rise in women’s education and job opportunities has gradually freed them from traditional gender roles. With more women pursuing higher education and careers, traditional gender roles are being challenged, leading to relationships based on equality and mutual respect.
I think love and marriage are personal rights for everyone. Decisions about whether to marry, when to marry, who to marry and whether to have children should be seen as personal freedoms.
The rise of dating apps and social media has also reshaped the way we approach relationships. While these platforms offer access to potential partners, they also breed a culture of instant satisfaction and superficial connections. As a result, many of us are redefining what it means to find love in the digital age, seeking deeper connections and meaningful experiences beyond the swipe of a screen.
As Taiwan continues to evolve, so too do our perceptions of marriage and commitment. While some might view this shift as a break from tradition, I see it as an opportunity for growth and self-discovery. By challenging societal norms and embracing our individuality, we are trying to find a way for a more open and real approach to love and relationships. The one that celebrates diversity and empowers each of us to live the life we want.
Through my own experiences and conversations with friends and family, I have learned that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to marriage. Each of us has to find our own way, guided by what we believe in and what we want out of life. Even though there is always pressure to do things a certain way, I am confident that my generation will keep moving forward, finding what marriage means to us and exploring healthier relationship views.
Wu Sih-sian is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS