As Taiwan grapples with the complexities of modern governance and societal challenges, one crucial aspect demanding attention is the active involvement of our youth in shaping the nation’s future. Engaging young people in civic affairs is not just a matter of democratic principle — it is a strategic imperative for building a more inclusive and sustainable society.
The significance of engaging young people lies in recognizing that young voices are essential for a vibrant and dynamic democracy. Empowering our youth to participate in political processes, community initiatives and public discourse is not merely a gesture of goodwill, but an investment in the long-term resilience and vitality of our nation.
To cultivate a culture of active citizenship among our youth, we must first recognize the inherent value of their perspectives and experiences. Young people bring fresh ideas, innovative solutions, and a deep sense of social justice to the table. Recent years have underscored the transformative potential of youth-led movements around the world.
By providing them with platforms to express their views and contribute to decisionmaking processes, we not only enrich our public discourse, but also nurture a sense of responsibility toward the common good within them.
Initiatives such as youth advisory councils and town hall meetings specifically for young people can help bridge the gap between generations and empower young people to become active participants in shaping their communities.
However, fostering youth civic engagement goes beyond mere participation — it is about creating an environment where young voices feel valued, heard, respected and supported. This imperative underscores the need for significant investment in educational programs aimed at promoting civic literacy, critical thinking and ethical leadership among youth. Schools play a vital role here, providing civics education that encourages students to critically analyze political issues, engage in respectful dialogue with peers, and understand their rights and responsibilities as citizens.
Moreover, building bridges between schools, communities and government institutions is crucial for facilitating meaningful youth participation in policymaking and governance. For example, local governments can take proactive measures by establishing youth councils or advisory boards to provide input on issues directly affecting young people.
In addition to formal mechanisms, creating informal spaces for youth to engage with civic life is essential. Community-based organizations and youth clubs can provide valuable opportunities for young people to develop leadership skills.
Furthermore, addressing the barriers that might prevent young people from participating fully in civic life is crucial. This includes addressing inequalities such as unequal access to education and economic opportunities, as well as removing bureaucratic obstacles that might hinder youth participation in decisionmaking processes.
In essence, encouraging youth engagement is not just about doing what is right — it is vital for our democracy’s strength.
By empowering our youth to become active agents of change, we can harness their energy and creativity to address pressing societal challenges. Let us listen to the young voices and work together to build a future that reflects the aspirations of all Taiwanese.
Hsu Hsin-fang is a student from the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
RSS