As Taiwan grapples with the complexities of modern governance and societal challenges, one crucial aspect demanding attention is the active involvement of our youth in shaping the nation’s future. Engaging young people in civic affairs is not just a matter of democratic principle — it is a strategic imperative for building a more inclusive and sustainable society.
The significance of engaging young people lies in recognizing that young voices are essential for a vibrant and dynamic democracy. Empowering our youth to participate in political processes, community initiatives and public discourse is not merely a gesture of goodwill, but an investment in the long-term resilience and vitality of our nation.
To cultivate a culture of active citizenship among our youth, we must first recognize the inherent value of their perspectives and experiences. Young people bring fresh ideas, innovative solutions, and a deep sense of social justice to the table. Recent years have underscored the transformative potential of youth-led movements around the world.
By providing them with platforms to express their views and contribute to decisionmaking processes, we not only enrich our public discourse, but also nurture a sense of responsibility toward the common good within them.
Initiatives such as youth advisory councils and town hall meetings specifically for young people can help bridge the gap between generations and empower young people to become active participants in shaping their communities.
However, fostering youth civic engagement goes beyond mere participation — it is about creating an environment where young voices feel valued, heard, respected and supported. This imperative underscores the need for significant investment in educational programs aimed at promoting civic literacy, critical thinking and ethical leadership among youth. Schools play a vital role here, providing civics education that encourages students to critically analyze political issues, engage in respectful dialogue with peers, and understand their rights and responsibilities as citizens.
Moreover, building bridges between schools, communities and government institutions is crucial for facilitating meaningful youth participation in policymaking and governance. For example, local governments can take proactive measures by establishing youth councils or advisory boards to provide input on issues directly affecting young people.
In addition to formal mechanisms, creating informal spaces for youth to engage with civic life is essential. Community-based organizations and youth clubs can provide valuable opportunities for young people to develop leadership skills.
Furthermore, addressing the barriers that might prevent young people from participating fully in civic life is crucial. This includes addressing inequalities such as unequal access to education and economic opportunities, as well as removing bureaucratic obstacles that might hinder youth participation in decisionmaking processes.
In essence, encouraging youth engagement is not just about doing what is right — it is vital for our democracy’s strength.
By empowering our youth to become active agents of change, we can harness their energy and creativity to address pressing societal challenges. Let us listen to the young voices and work together to build a future that reflects the aspirations of all Taiwanese.
Hsu Hsin-fang is a student from the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS