The 77th World Health Assembly will be held in Geneva, on May 27–June 1 this year. The theme of this year is All for Health, Health for All. Regrettably, Taiwan remains the WHA’s missing link.
In analyzing global health politics, it is evident that the challenges are vast and complex. Overcoming them demands unified, unbiased efforts, transcending political or territorial divides.
Granting Taiwan observer status in WHA will not only serve the vulnerable with measurable impact for 23.9 million inhabitants but also provide the World Health Organization (WHO), which holds the WHA, with crucial data on global health issues.
Taiwan has sought to participate as an observer in forums such as the WHA, but China has argued that under UN Resolution 2758, Taiwan is part of China and cannot be a separate UN member.
However, the resolution did not preclude Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the UN system or in any other multilateral forum.
Speaking at a seminar held by the German Marshall Fund, US Deputy Assistant Secretary for China and Taiwan Mark Lambert called for support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the international community at a time when China is increasingly misusing Resolution 2758.
Acute health emergencies affect millions of people around the world each year and keeping the world safe and protecting the vulnerable are top priorities for the WHA. The WHO works with countries and partners to prepare for, prevent, detect and respond to disease outbreaks and other health emergencies.
Taiwan is a highly capable, engaged and responsible member of the global health community. Taiwan should leverage the international support it received during the COVID-19 pandemic and continue to mobilize strong opposition to and clarification of Resolution 2758 in Taiwan’s meaningful participation and observership at the WHA.
The Biden administration’s immediate priority is to strongly counter and clarify Resolution 2758, as Taiwan is a very capable health partner. The exclusion of Taiwan has raised concerns over the intersection of geopolitics and global health imperatives. Let Taiwan join the 77th session of the World Health Assembly.
Kent Wang is advisory commissioner for the Overseas Community Affairs Council, Republic of China (Taiwan) in the US.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has