Central and Eastern European (CEE) governments have long prided themselves on their tough migration policies. Over the past decades, many of the region’s political leaders have focused their efforts on curbing the flow of migrants and asylum seekers, contending that an influx of third-country nationals would undermine social stability, threaten cultural cohesion and even pose a security risk.
For example, in 2015, at the height of the EU’s migration crisis, the four Visegrad (V4) countries — the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia — vehemently opposed the bloc’s refugee quota system, which aimed to share the burden by allocating a certain number of asylum seekers to each EU country based on population, GDP and other factors. Hungary and Slovakia were among the most vocal critics of the plan, arguing that mandatory quotas were an attack on national sovereignty.
To be sure, CEE countries – most notably, Poland and the Czech Republic – welcomed millions of Ukrainians driven out of their homes by the Russian invasion in 2022. But despite this generosity, V4 leaders have continued to take a tough line on migration. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban — a self-declared champion of Europe’s Christian values — promotes a vision of a homogeneous Hungarian society.
Illustration: Tania Chou
Hungary granted refugee status to only 10 people in 2022, earning a rebuke from the EU’s top court. In Slovakia, Prime Minister Robert Fico’s left-populist Smer-Social Democracy party won last year’s election by exploiting resentment against Ukrainian refugees. Moreover, the region recently stepped up efforts to stop illegal immigration through the Balkans by introducing stricter controls and deploying security forces to patrol borders.
A negative narrative about migrants has helped leaders such as Orban and Fico consolidate electoral support by playing on voters’ fears of otherness, economic anxiety and desire for stability in an unsettled world. However, that does not change the fact that the region is facing an acute shortage of skilled workers — a pressing issue on which politicians have remained largely silent.
Indeed, CEE countries are increasingly liberalizing their immigration rules and procedures to enable the entry and employment of foreigners. In January, Hungary, seeking to attract applicants from third countries, fast-tracked a new immigration law that introduces new short-term guest and skilled-worker visas. The interministerial effort was accompanied by new outsourcing contracts to improve the efficiency of visa processing in countries such as Oman, Qatar and Uzbekistan.
Hungary has little choice. With a rapidly aging population, severe labor shortages in the coming years would hamper the government’s ambition to become an electric-vehicle (EV) manufacturing hub and defense industrial base. In 2022, China’s CATL announced that it would build a 7.3 billion euro (US$7.9 billion) EV battery plant in Hungary, the largest such investment in Europe to date. Last year, China’s BYD shared its plans to open an EV factory in the country — its first in Europe. The German defense contractor Rheinmetall recently opened a new factory in the Hungarian city of Zalaegerszeg, while armored tactical vehicles are to be produced in the city of Gyor. All of these ventures will require sufficient human capital.
The Czech Republic has also sought to attract third-country nationals, including in September 2022, when it simplified the recruitment process for “critically needed” workers and improved oversight of working conditions for foreigners. Last summer, the country aligned its laws with the EU Blue Card Directive, which governs entry and residence conditions for highly qualified workers from third countries.
Meanwhile, in 2019, Poland made it easier for holders of temporary residence and work permits who are pursuing a profession deemed desirable for the Polish economy to acquire permanent residence.
Likewise, the number of foreign workers in Slovakia increased seven-fold from 2013 to 2022, with some manufacturers, such as the British automaker Jaguar Land Rover, relying heavily on workers from abroad. Many more of these workers are coming from farther away — such as India or Kazakhstan, rather than Serbia or Ukraine. Still, there are more than 80,000 long-term, unfilled vacancies, especially in the mechanical engineering, automotive, transport, healthcare and information technology sectors.
The labor shortage is likely to worsen: Demand for skills in the industries of the future is only increasing, at the same time as fertility rates are declining, and young people are leaving the region to pursue better opportunities elsewhere. To plug these competency gaps, CEE countries must continue to reform their immigration policies. Failure to do so could result in widespread economic pain, as they might miss out on new investments that could generate GDP growth and raise tax revenue.
The question is not whether immigration is good or bad, but how it can yield benefits for both destination countries and third-country workers. Policymakers’ primary goal should be to maximize the gains from immigration, which will require consulting with the private sector to continue identifying the skills that are needed.
Existing tools, such as the EU Blue Card, have been somewhat successful in addressing worker shortages, but would benefit from streamlining procedures and harmonizing criteria across the bloc’s member states. Moreover, introducing new global skills schemes — especially with non-EU countries — that address current and future labor-market needs could facilitate economic migration while reducing brain drain at home.
CEE governments’ performative hostility toward migrants cannot disguise their desperate need for foreign workers. Political leaders must now make a positive case for immigration — publicly and repeatedly — to convince their voters that all will gain from the economic benefits newcomers generate.
Sona Muzikarova, a political economist focused on Central and Eastern Europe and a research fellow at the European University Institute, is a former economist at the European Central Bank and a former senior adviser to Slovakia’s deputy minister of foreign affairs.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Starting this month, young women in Denmark would be subject to conscription on the same terms as men. All Danes, regardless of gender, would be required to register for military assessment, and eligible individuals would be selected through a lottery-based draft. In addition, service time would be increased to 11 months, and conscript numbers would grow to meet national defense targets. Denmark is not alone. In the past few years, several European countries, most notably Sweden and Norway, have adopted gender-neutral conscription systems. Latvia is moving in the same direction. The war in Ukraine has accelerated this trend. Faced with the
RSS