Taiwan clinched another victory in deepening trade ties with India through its semiconductor diplomacy. Last week, the Indian government started the construction of three new chip manufacturing facilities in Gujarat and Assam, including a fab to be built with the assistance of Taiwan’s Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp (PSMC).
The strategic use of semiconductor technology, production and supply chain diplomacy might be a convenient approach for a diplomatic breakthrough, since many governments are keen to build local chip supply and boost supply chain resilience to help them weather geopolitical tensions and prepare for contingencies such as a global pandemic. However, Taiwanese companies should be cautious in making inroads into India’s chip market, as there are multiple factors behind successfully building a chip industry.
India showed its generosity by offering to shoulder half the cost of approved projects, up to an initial ceiling of US$10 billion, and aims to build a chip industry strong enough to compete with South Korea and China. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Cabinet has approved US$15.2 billion worth of investments in semiconductor fabs, including a proposal to build the country’s first 12-inch chipmaking facility.
By 2027, India would have the fab and outsourced semiconductor assembly and test (OSAT) units producing, India Cellular and Electronics Association chairman Pankaj Mohindroo said early this month, adding that by the end of the decade, it might have more than 10 fabs and 20 OSAT units in production, and many semiconductor product design companies.
US chipmakers Micron Technology Inc and AMD Inc have announced investment plans in India, but how those projects would play out remains unknown. India is well-known for its superior software talent, rather than chip manufacturing engineers, and lacks a well-developed infrastructure essential for chip production. Without a stable and sufficient supply of electricity and water, it would be impossible to persuade major chipmakers to build fabs, as any production disruption would lead to massive losses. PSMC has concerns about whether India would be able to build its own chip industry and is playing it safe, only offering know-how and advice to Tata about constructing the 12-inch chip manufacturing facilities.
It would not invest any equity in the fab and would not be involved in its operation, PSMC chairman Frank Huang (黃崇仁) said, adding that this is the “assignment” from President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
Some Taiwanese semiconductor parts and equipment suppliers have followed in the footsteps of their clients, tapping into the Indian market. However, they are only selling their goods, with no substantial plans to build a local presence. Most companies have taken a wait-and-see approach given the high risks.
It is a huge challenge to be successful in the chip industry, especially for a country starting from scratch. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) success is built on three decades of constant efforts. As a result, Taiwan has become the most cost-effective chipmaking site. It is extremely difficult to duplicate this experience in developing semiconductor manufacturing supply chains.
Talent is the most important part of a chipmaker’s success, in addition to an abundant supply of water, electricity and land.
It takes at least eight years to cultivate a skillful semiconductor engineer, TSMC has said.
India seeks to be a chip powerhouse in five years, but with many countries aiming to build their own chip supply, chipmakers face a talent scarcity. Talent acquisition is a top priority for major chip companies, making it even more difficult to compete for talent.
Considerable challenges and uncertainties lie ahead for India’s chip industry so Taiwanese companies should be prudent about its business decisions and pay extra heed to the business environment.
Making chips requires more than just money.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
RSS