Last month, Taiwan and India signed a memorandum of understanding signaling a willingness to make India a source of migrant workers. The Ministry of Labor said that Indian migrant workers would make up for the shortage of workers in the manufacturing, construction, agricultural and homecare sectors.
It would not only solve the urgent need for workers in Taiwan, but also contribute to the nation’s strategic plans in the long run.
Indian migrant workers would also be a great source for Taiwan to understand India more. Based on a solid mutual understanding, Taiwan-India relations can be strengthened in a reciprocal way.
First, Indian migrant workers would increase the South Asian nation’s foreign exchange, and New Delhi would have to pay more attention to Taiwan’s economic development and political stability.
Second, after Indian migrant workers come to Taiwan, both Taipei and New Delhi would have to collaborate with one another more closely for all kinds of administrative procedures. This would allow the two countries, which do not have official diplomatic relations, to work more intimately than before.
Besides, once India becomes a source of migrant workers, Taiwan can gain more leverage when negotiating with the Philippines and Indonesia, two countries that it relies on heavily for labor.
That way, better agreements can be achieved for domestic industries.
India is the world’s most populous country and the fifth-largest economy. It has the potential to become one of the most significant players in a multipolar world.
Making India a source of migrant workers is an initial, but important step. This could bring about a more promising India-Taiwan relationship and further collaboration in the future.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service and has a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in the US.
Translated by Emma Liu
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently sat down for an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson in which he openly acknowledged that ChatGPT’s model behavior is indeed influencing the entire world, and that he himself is responsible for the decisions related to the bot’s moral framework. He said that he has not had a good night of sleep since its launch, as the technology could bring about unpredictable consequences. Although the discussion took place in the US, it is closely related to Taiwan. While Altman worries about the concentration of power, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has already weaponized artificial
RSS