Taiwan’s economy has gradually rebounded from a slowdown that started in the second quarter of last year. GDP is set to grow by the fastest pace in three years, but over-reliance on the technology sector, a talent shortage and imbalanced power generation development might limit continued economic expansion in the coming years, Pegatron Corp chairman and Taipei Computer Association honorary chairman Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢) said at a forum in Taipei on Friday last week.
Overseas shipments of Taiwan-made electronics, semiconductors, computers and communication devices accounted for 55 percent of the nation’s overall exports last year, Tung said, adding that the ratio could exceed 60 percent if shipments of precision machinery and optical equipment were included.
There is no doubt that steady development in the technology sector has enabled Taiwan to play a pivotal role in global supply chains, specifically in the semiconductor industry. It has become a major pillar of the nation’s economy, but is the growth sustainable?
With globalization, an ever-evolving landscape of geopolitics, stricter technology controls around the world and rising production costs due to demographic shifts and natural resource scarcity, Taiwanese technology firms must seek new niche markets to stay afloat, Tung said. “The nation’s industrial landscape needs to be more diverse,” he said.
Tung also mentioned challenges the nation is facing — including renewable energy intermittency and Taiwan’s geographical features. The government should be more cautious with energy policy and prepare for new technology, he said.
Taiwan has been working toward boosting its solar efficiency and has been using cleaner and more sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels, such as wind power and hydropower.
The economy this year would likely expand by 3.43 percent, compared with last year’s 1.31 percent, the largest increase since 2021, when the economy grew 6.62 percent, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS).
The estimated growth is slightly higher than the average 3.26 percent from 2013 to 2022, indicating the growth momentum would likely return to normal this year. However, slow global economic recovery and uncertainty with geopolitical risks would drive firms to remain prudent in capital expenditure planning.
Private investment is expected to grow 1.45 percent this year, down 1.72 percentage points from the previous estimate and lower than the 6.76 percent average growth from 2013 to 2022, the DGBAS said.
This begs the question: Are there any other industries that would increase their investments and help stabilize Taiwan’s economy when the nation’s main industries are in bad shape?
Over the past few years, local media have often referred to the biotech industry as another “sacred mountain” protecting the country just like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. However, it is doubtful whether this industry is globally competitive.
Taiwan’s aging population and declining birthrate could also prompt the healthcare system to acquire more medical equipment and boost the development of biomedicine and pharmaceuticals. However, this would require massive investment and years of research and development.
Meanwhile, the information and communications technology industry has seen growth amid the artificial intelligence (AI) frenzy, with those focused on AI performing exceptionally well. It remains to be seen whether this industry will continue on its upward trend in the years to come.
Vice President William Lai (賴清德) is set to take office as president on May 20. Policies that can ease Taiwanese industries’ difficulties and help the economy grow would show that the new government truly believes in “Made in Taiwan.”
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at