An online petition started by a doctor in Taichung called on lawmakers to halt an amendment that would shorten the time needed for Chinese spouses of Taiwanese to gain citizenship in Taiwan.
The amendment could put a strain on Taiwan’s already burdened National Health Insurance (NHI) system, Cheng Ching Hospital thoracic surgery division doctor Tu Cheng-che (杜承哲) said. Doctors have seen many Chinese spouses bring their relatives to hospital emergency rooms, asking for full checkups, he added.
“They [Chinese spouses] even tell their relatives that healthcare in Taiwan is free and is easily accessible, and that healthcare providers in Taiwan would not deny a request for a full checkup,” Tu said.
There were 350,000 Chinese spouses in Taiwan, accounting for 60 percent of all non-Taiwanese spouses in the country, a report published by the Taipei Times on April 6, 2020, showed. The report also said that 130,000 were naturalized.
If all of those naturalized Chinese spouses regularly invited relatives from China to receive medical care here, it could indeed put excessive strain on medical resources. However, the possibility of exacerbating the situation — should there be an increase in naturalized Chinese spouses — should not be a basis for denying them a shorter naturalization process.
In principle, spouses from China should be subject to the same benefits and regulations that apply to other foreign spouses. For example, it is still possible for Cuban nationals to apply for US citizenship if they are married to a US citizen, despite an embargo on Cuba.
Arguably, by imposing the same rules on Chinese as it does on other foreign nationals, the government sends a clear message to Beijing that Taiwan is a sovereign nation that is not subject to the laws of China. If the law allows foreign spouses to bring their relatives to Taiwan for medical treatment, then it would hardly seem right to deny Chinese spouses this right.
If there is an issue of misuse or overuse of medical resources, the government should address that through a separate amendment that makes it more difficult, or even impossible, for relatives of foreign spouses to visit hospitals or clinics in Taiwan except in emergencies. Emergencies could include cases like heart attacks and traffic accidents.
Another option would be to simply charge a premium for those who seek medical treatment without NHI coverage. That money could be used toward resources, which would benefit those who the medical system is intended to help.
“Another issue is equality,” Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) said on Tuesday. Foreigners are required to renounce their original citizenship to acquire Taiwanese citizenship, but China does not agree to Chinese giving up their citizenship, she said.
Wu is correct, but no law enacted by Taiwanese lawmakers could ever compel the Chinese government to allow Chinese to renounce their citizenship.
China is not the only country with such a policy. For example, Costa Rica does not allow its nationals to renounce their citizenship, following a change to its constitution in 1995.
The best approach would be for Taiwan to allow all eligible foreign nationals to naturalize without renunciation of their original citizenship. The US, Canada, the UK, Australia, New Zealand and many other democracies already allow dual citizenship.
It is actually Taiwan that created an unequal situation by requiring the renunciation of foreign citizenship for naturalization, as Taiwanese are allowed to retain theirs when they become citizens of other countries.
While it is important to protect access to medical and other resources, lawmakers should seek to do so in a way that does not create inequality for eligible foreign nationals who seek Taiwanese citizenship.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS