The past 12 years have been extremely good for the ultra-rich. The fortunes of billionaires — a group comprising the 2,640 wealthiest people on the planet, most of whom are men — has more than doubled. The wealth gap between the top 0.01 percent and the bottom half of the world’s population has increased by 50 percent since the 2008 global financial crisis.
The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine have been particularly lucrative for the ultra-wealthy as they reaped an enormous windfall from pandemic-era stimulus packages and corporate welfare, raked in record profits by raising prices and blaming inflation, and benefited from decades of favorable policies.
A recent report by Oxfam found that the combined wealth of the world’s five richest people — Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bernard Arnault, Larry Ellison and Warren Buffett — has more than doubled since 2020 to US$869 billion.
Illustration: Mountain People
At the same time, nearly 5 billion people, representing 60 percent of the world’s population, have become poorer. While global income inequality declined gradually, primarily due to rising incomes in China, inequality between countries has increased for the first time in decades, and inequality within most countries has increased, too.
Worryingly, a recent World Bank analysis has found that “the fight against poverty has stalled.”
Given the current trajectory of wealth distribution, the world could have its first trillionaire within a decade, while eradicating global poverty would take 230 years.
While such statistics might no longer be surprising, they should be alarming, for the trend they capture poses a grave threat to democratic governance. While rising inequality is rightly linked to tax policies and debt, we can no longer overlook the crucial role of corporate monopolies in transferring wealth from the working and middle classes to the top 0.1 percent.
In the 12 months up to June last year, 148 of the world’s largest firms earned nearly US$1.8 trillion in profits, a 52 percent increase from their average annual profits between 2018 and 2021.
Corporate gains have come at the expense of workers, as merely 0.4 percent of the world’s 1,600 most influential companies have publicly committed to paying and supporting a living wage.
Meanwhile, rich shareholders are receiving US$82 of every US$100 in profits through dividends and buybacks.
Dominant firms draw workers, consumers and smaller businesses into their orbit, with multinationals’ share of global profits quadrupling over the past 40 years of neoliberal orthodoxy.
According to a recent study by the IMF, the increase in monopoly power accounts for 76 percent of the decline in labor’s share of income in the US manufacturing sector over the second half of the 20th century.
In today’s highly concentrated world economy, the “Big Three” index funds — BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street — control more than US$20 trillion in assets. Even the late John Bogle, Vanguard’s founder, sounded the alarm about the Big Three’s dominance in 2018, warning of a future in which “a handful of giant institutional investors will one day hold voting control of virtually every large US corporation.”
During the original Gilded Age, monopolists such as John D. Rockefeller were synonymous with economic power. In the contemporary iteration, seven of the world’s 10 largest firms either have a billionaire chief executive officer or a billionaire as a principal shareholder, giving Rockefeller’s modern-day counterparts even greater influence over our political economies.
This extreme concentration of wealth and power is reminiscent of what late US Supreme Court justice William Douglas called an “industrial oligarchy,” whereby people’s fortunes are “dependent on the whim or caprice, the political prejudices, the emotional stability of a few self-appointed men.”
However, while this state of affairs might seem bleak, recent developments offer a glimmer of hope.
Consider the US. Since 2020, the top 0.1 percent of Americans, who own 13.9 percent of the country’s wealth, have become more than US$2 trillion richer than the poorest half of the population, which holds just 2.6 percent of the country’s wealth. The racial wealth gap is nearly as large as it was in 1950, with the typical white household owning six times as much as its black counterpart.
Meanwhile, as tens of millions of Americans struggle to make ends meet, hunger has increased to its highest level in nearly a decade.
However, the good news is that low-wage workers have experienced real-wage growth over the past three years and the wealth of the bottom 50 percent has slightly increased. Crucially, there has been a resurgence in labor action, with more than 460,000 workers going on strike last year — the second-highest number since 1986. Striking autoworkers, UPS drivers and Hollywood screenwriters have scored major victories over the past year, showing that progress is possible.
An economic paradigm shift appears to be under way within the US government, exemplified by a reinvigorated anti-monopoly movement.
US Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan and Jonathan Kanter, the head of the US Department of Justice’s antitrust division, have advanced a series of ambitious reforms, rewriting the lax merger guidelines that enabled corporations to amass unprecedented power, proposing a ban on non-compete clauses, and securing landmark victories for patients and consumers.
The commission’s antitrust lawsuit against Amazon, in particular, represents a powerful rebuke to industrial oligarchy.
To be sure, the decades-long dominance of neoliberalism — the handmaiden to soaring inequality in the US — will not be dismantled overnight. To get there, the US Congress must rein in outsize private power and pass legislation capping excess profits, guaranteeing living wages and safeguarding collective bargaining rights.
The US should not act in isolation. Brazil’s G20 presidency offers a unique opportunity to establish international cooperation to combat inequality.
Reimagining public action is vital to advancing this paradigm shift. As US President Joe Biden revives industrial policy, we must ensure that tax dollars are not used to subsidize corporate dominance.
Guarantees and public solutions that uphold people’s interests, such as universal family care and affordable housing, offer promising pathways from oligarchy.
Escaping the new Gilded Age might be a more daunting challenge than escaping the original one was, but as workers, regulators and organizers are showing, the fight against inequality can be won.
Nabil Ahmed is director of economic and racial justice of Oxfam America.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS