Taiwan is increasingly under threat from cyberattacks, but it still largely relies on imported software and hardware for cybersecurity, information security specialists said on Sunday.
Taiwan has the highest frequency of cyberattacks in Asia due to its geopolitical status, and the situation is being exacerbated by an increasing reliance on cloud-based services and the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI), Taipei University of Technology vice president Yang Shih-hsuan (楊士萱) said.
Systex Solutions Corp vice president Chan Yi-cheng (詹伊正) said that Taiwanese start-ups are reluctant to develop their own systems due to the relatively small size of the domestic market and the large amount of capital needed.
The issue must be addressed through policy support, and subsequently through legislation that prohibits Taiwanese firms from using components made in China or elsewhere in the domestic manufacture of cybersecurity systems, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator-at-large Puma Shen (沈伯洋) said.
The government should not leave the development of such crucial technology to private industry alone, and should do more to cultivate local talent, he said.
Chan said the industry is facing a shortage of about 80,000 people, and without government assistance it is unlikely to secure the talent and funding it needs.
The ruling DPP has prioritized the development of the domestic defense industry, and this must include cybersecurity.
The EU’s European External Action Service’s second Report on Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference Threats, published on Jan. 23, highlighted cyberattacks targeting Taiwan from Dec. 1, 2022, to Nov. 30 last year. The attacks listed in the report mostly comprised “non-illegal pattern of behavior that threatens or has the potential to negatively impact values, procedures and political processes.” However, while most cyberattacks originating in China currently are part of cognitive warfare efforts aimed at social disruption in Taiwan, China could try to compromise Taiwan’s critical infrastructure.
A report by NBC News on Aug. 13 last year cited the US’ Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s annual threat assessment report as saying that “China almost certainly is capable of launching cyber attacks that could disrupt critical infrastructure services within the United States.”
Beijing would likely seek do so in the event of an attack on Taiwan, as a means of deterring the US from involvement in the conflict, the news report cited US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency director Jen Easterly as saying.
If Beijing could launch effective cyberattacks on US infrastructure during a conflict in the Taiwan Strait, then it would most certainly do the same to Taiwan. Such infrastructure-targeting cyberattacks are no longer hypothetical, after hackers on Nov. 25 last year took control of a part of the Municipal Water Authority of Aliquippa in the US state of Pennsylvania. The hackers entered the system through an Israeli-made programmable logic controller, the Hill reported on Dec. 23.
This is all the more reason for Taiwan to develop its own cybersecurity software and hardware. Taiwanese information security specialist Liu Yan-po (劉彥伯) said that many of the systems in use in Taiwan come from the US or Israel. If hackers from China and elsewhere were capable of compromising US and Israeli systems, they would have a head start during an attack on Taiwan. Locally developed systems could slow down hackers enough for Taiwanese officials to launch response measures or switch to backup systems.
To ensure that Taiwan can remain resilient in the face of cyberthreats, the government should begin funding the development of domestically made cybersecurity systems, and encourage training in the industry through subsidies or guaranteed employment. Experts have predicted that the next major war would be fought in cyberspace, and while events in Ukraine prove that Taiwan must still be prepared for conventional warfare, it must also prepare itself on the digital front — before it is too late.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS