During her 44 days in office, former British prime minister Liz Truss became a laughingstock. After her September 2022 “mini-budget” sparked an economic crisis, a British tabloid livestreamed a head of lettuce, predicting it would outlast the prime minister’s tenure. Six days later, the vegetable was intact and Truss was gone.
After resigning, Truss’ own Conservative Party members mocked her. With a ruined reputation, Truss was an odd choice for Taiwan’s government to invite just seven months later.
The pick was understandable: Truss was the most prominent British politician to visit Taiwan since former UK prime minister Margaret Thatcher in 1996. Her status was maybe seen as eclipsing a debacle many Taiwanese missed.
However, there is a more important reason authorities should have thought twice before paying a reported ￡80,000 (US$101,064) for Truss’ participation in an event hosted by the government-sponsored Prospect Foundation think tank.
Truss has long been a flip-flopper, disowning previous positions and switching allegiances when it suits her. A child of left-wing activists, she participated in nuclear disarmament marches and anti-Thatcher protests. At Oxford University, Truss was president of the Liberal Democrats student branch. She campaigned for cannabis decriminalization and the abolishment of the monarchy.
This made her Damascene conversion to conservatism at Oxford baffling, and her progressive past dogged her as she campaigned in August 2022 for leadership of the Conservative Party.
These changes might have been a natural evolution and demonstrated commendable adaptability, yet Truss’ turnarounds continued throughout her career, and some cannot be dismissed as youthful indiscretions.
Most obvious was her Brexit volte-face. Having campaigned for the UK to remain in the EU, she backtracked after the referendum passed. She reasoned that leaving the EU would “shake up the way things work.”
After former UK prime minister Boris Johnson made her foreign secretary in 2021, she scrapped parts of the Northern Ireland Protocol — a post-Brexit deal with the EU — and doubled down as prime minister, drawing criticism from European leaders.
Perhaps Taiwan’s government was hoodwinked by Truss’ bravado in posing atop a tank in Estonia as she condemned Russia’s military buildup along its border in late 2022. Like Johnson, Truss is a staunch supporter of Ukraine and an outspoken critic of Russia and China.
In her Taipei speech, Truss lamented the “mixed messages from the free world” on China and the “false idea” that Beijing negotiates in good faith. She demanded an elevation in Taiwan’s status and concrete measures to bolster its defense, reiterating remarks in Tokyo months earlier.
Politico’s revelations that Truss lobbied to expedite military equipment sales to China three months after her Taipei trip must have stunned Taiwanese officials.
In a letter to British Business and Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch, Truss asked that a license to supply landmine disposal equipment be granted to Richmond Defence Systems, a firm based in her constituency. The company’s previous application was blocked on security grounds.
Pushing the company’s case, Truss said a rejection would cost it millions of pounds, adding that China “would simply reverse engineer and manufacture the products themselves” — a comment experts have dismissed.
While Truss has been silent, her fellow Conservative lawmaker Alicia Kearns responded unequivocally to the news. Kearns, who visited Taiwan in late 2022, said Truss’ lobbying was “against our national interests, and most certainly those of our ally Taiwan.”
Declining to comment, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement through spokesperson Jeff Liu (劉永健), saying that Truss’ words or actions had not harmed Taiwan.
The ministry responded to inquiries about Truss’ appearance fee, saying it was not involved in the contracting process. While technically true, the National Security Council does give funding to the Prospect Foundation. This is taxpayer money. As such, officials should take care when inviting foreign dignitaries.
Prominent visitors to Taiwan include former Czech president Vaclav Havel and Nobel Peace Prize Winner Archbishop Desmond Tutu. They were noted for their unwavering commitment to freedom and democracy. For all his faults, former US president Bill Clinton, who has visited Taiwan several times, carries the requisite political heft.
Truss lacks these qualities and her selling point has been exposed as a sham. Leaving aside her ineptitude as former British prime minister, she has built a career on opportunistic changes of course. Superficial and self-serving, she should be engaged with only with extreme caution.
James Baron is a freelance journalist and writer based in Taiwan.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS