Now that The presidential and legislative elections are over, having gone through political turmoil, such as the failed alliance attempt of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the alleged illegal constructions on candidates’ properties and the unpredictability of TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) shenanigans, the voters have chosen the right person and path.
It is the first time since Taiwan’s first direct presidential election in 1996 that a party has won more than two consecutive presidential elections. President-elect William Lai (賴清德) and vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) are the best result for Taiwan to continue advancing on a democratic road and on the world stage.
Rather than being excited, I am concerned about the vote share.
Among the three presidential candidates and their running mates, the Lai-Hsiao ticket should have been our only choice in terms of experience, ability, words, deeds, attitude and so on.
However, their vote share failed to exceed the total of the KMT and TPP candidates, which means that Taiwanese are not as persistent on sovereignty and self-governance.
In the legislative elections, candidates such as KMT Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君), who obstructs national defense and is illegally occupying public land; former KMT legislator Yen Kuan-heng (顏寬恆), whose family illegally acquired property; and KMT Legislator Chen Hsueh-sheng (陳雪生), who had harassed Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Fan Yun (范雲) during a legislature scuffle in 2020, were re-elected.
On the other hand, Taipei City Councilor Miao Po-ya (苗博雅), whose diligence and excellence were great examples of Taiwan’s new politics and younger politicians, lost her race. However, the completely unqualified KMT Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) succeeded.
As a young person with high hopes for Taiwanese politics, how could I be optimistic? Ko was supported by more than a quarter of the electorate with his opportunism and populist manipulation. I worry about Taiwan’s future.
In the next four years, the voices of small parties are to be absent from the legislature due to absorption by the TPP, which labels itself as a “third force.”
Without effective supervision by local opposition parties and political negotiations to form policies that benefit Taiwanese, the DPP might have to fight alone and even compromise on sovereignty and progressive issues.
Moreover, with more KMT and TPP than DPP legislators, the TPP would reap benefits as a third party; even more so, as a political opportunist party bent on increasing its influence in the process of political negotiation. It is likely that future bills and budgets would be difficult to promote.
Hong Tsun-ming, originally from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS