Now that The presidential and legislative elections are over, having gone through political turmoil, such as the failed alliance attempt of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the alleged illegal constructions on candidates’ properties and the unpredictability of TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) shenanigans, the voters have chosen the right person and path.
It is the first time since Taiwan’s first direct presidential election in 1996 that a party has won more than two consecutive presidential elections. President-elect William Lai (賴清德) and vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) are the best result for Taiwan to continue advancing on a democratic road and on the world stage.
Rather than being excited, I am concerned about the vote share.
Among the three presidential candidates and their running mates, the Lai-Hsiao ticket should have been our only choice in terms of experience, ability, words, deeds, attitude and so on.
However, their vote share failed to exceed the total of the KMT and TPP candidates, which means that Taiwanese are not as persistent on sovereignty and self-governance.
In the legislative elections, candidates such as KMT Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君), who obstructs national defense and is illegally occupying public land; former KMT legislator Yen Kuan-heng (顏寬恆), whose family illegally acquired property; and KMT Legislator Chen Hsueh-sheng (陳雪生), who had harassed Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Fan Yun (范雲) during a legislature scuffle in 2020, were re-elected.
On the other hand, Taipei City Councilor Miao Po-ya (苗博雅), whose diligence and excellence were great examples of Taiwan’s new politics and younger politicians, lost her race. However, the completely unqualified KMT Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) succeeded.
As a young person with high hopes for Taiwanese politics, how could I be optimistic? Ko was supported by more than a quarter of the electorate with his opportunism and populist manipulation. I worry about Taiwan’s future.
In the next four years, the voices of small parties are to be absent from the legislature due to absorption by the TPP, which labels itself as a “third force.”
Without effective supervision by local opposition parties and political negotiations to form policies that benefit Taiwanese, the DPP might have to fight alone and even compromise on sovereignty and progressive issues.
Moreover, with more KMT and TPP than DPP legislators, the TPP would reap benefits as a third party; even more so, as a political opportunist party bent on increasing its influence in the process of political negotiation. It is likely that future bills and budgets would be difficult to promote.
Hong Tsun-ming, originally from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS