At a dinner event in San Francisco on Nov. 15 with a swathe of US business leaders and political heavyweights, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) failed to deliver any tangible benefits that people had expected, nor did he offer reassurance to corporate leaders feeling uneasy about the prospects of the sputtering Chinese economy.
However, one of the highlights from the evening was that Xi called pandas “the ambassador of friendship,” hinting at the possibility that China could be willing to resume its “panda diplomacy” by sending more of the animals to the US.
Ever since then-US president Richard Nixon’s visit to China in 1972 and the gift of two pandas to the Smithsonian’s National Zoo the same year, Beijing has adopted “panda diplomacy” by using the endangered black-and-white bears as tools for international “united front” work.
For the sake of wildlife conservation, Beijing announced that it would stop sending pandas abroad in 1982, and has suspended all leasing practices. The 60 or more pandas in zoos across the US and Europe are all loaned for “mating” or “conservation” purposes. The two pandas (later named Tuan Tuan [團團] and Yuan Yuan [圓圓], their names combined meaning “reunion” in Chinese) that were given to Taipei Zoo were offered as a gift for a mutual exchange of endangered animals.
Classified as an “endangered” species, pandas are expensive animals to keep. The US has to pay an annual rental fee of about US$500,000 to US$1 million, not to mention provisioning and regulatory services as well as providing a tailored environment and provision of fresh bamboo leaves. As a result, pandas come with a hefty price tag.
When Western countries and China were in their honeymoon period, people overlooked the economic burden that pandas bring. However, as the honeymoon bubble has burst, the global community no longer harbors delusions about China and in turn, pandas have gone out of favor.
In February, when a giant panda died of heart failure at Memphis Zoo in Tennessee, the incident triggered a wave of anger among Chinese nationalists on the Internet, accusing the zoo of “abuse.” Ya Ya (丫丫)who went to Memphis from Beijing Zoo in 2003, was expected to be returned to China in April, when the zoo’s loan agreement expired.
The National Zoo also returned its three pandas — Mei Xiang (美香), Tian Tian (添添) and their three-year-old male cub, Xiao Qi Ji (小奇蹟) — to China earlier this month. By the end of the year, only four giant pandas will remain in the US: the two adults and two cubs at Zoo Atlanta. The lease agreement is set to expire next year.
In the UK, the two giant pandas that have been housed at Edinburgh Zoo since 2011 will return to China this month, which would mean no more pandas in the UK. As people’s enthusiasm for pandas has taken a nosedive over the years, China’s global image and influence have done the same. The trend is marked contrast to that of “panda-huggers,” an epithet used to refer to those deemed too soft on China, one which no US politicians would want to be saddled with.
In July, Xi held a state banquet for former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse, the meeting can be read as a move of the last panda huggers finding refuge in each others’ arms.
As the relationship between the US and China spirals downward, Xi is now looking to reboot panda diplomacy now that he has no cards up his sleeves. Even if pandas are successfully sent to the California Zoo, it is apparent that the days of the panda huggers are a thing of the past.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Rita Wang
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS