At 6.30am on Oct. 7, hundreds of armed Hamas terrorists invaded Israel from Gaza. They took over Israeli towns and villages, broke into homes and slaughtered entire families. Some civilians were burned in their homes. Others were dragged outside and brutally executed. Young children witnessed their mothers being butchered. Some villages were burned to the ground.
At the same time, Hamas terrorists infiltrated a music festival attended by thousands of young people, killing everyone in their way. Hundreds of young men and women who were there to celebrate life and music were murdered.
The Hamas terrorists returned to Gaza, parading desecrated and naked bodies of young women through the streets, as hundreds of observers celebrated and handed out candy.
If that is not enough, the Hamas terrorists also kidnapped more than 150 people, mostly civilians, including children, babies, mothers, fathers, disabled people and elderly women. Some were dragged out of their nursing homes. The youngest was a six-month-old and the eldest an 85-year-old Holocaust survivor.
About 1,300 men and women were murdered on Oct. 7 alone, the greatest number of Jews murdered in a single day since the Holocaust.
More than 3,000 people were injured, some critically, but all have been traumatized for life.
This was not only an attack against Israelis. Dozens of the people who were wounded, murdered or abducted were citizens of the US, the UK, Canada, France, Italy, Thailand, Ukraine, Nepal, Brazil, Germany, Russia, China and elsewhere. More than 43 states had citizens who were murdered and kidnapped.
Oct. 7 is Israel’s Sept. 11, 2001, and Pearl Harbor combined. It is a small country; 1,300 dead in Israel would be proportionally equivalent to more than 3,000 people dead in Taiwan.
We all know someone who was killed, wounded or abducted. I know three people who lost their lives on Oct. 7 and the number might climb, as many of the bodies have yet to be identified because they were desecrated so badly.
There is a lot to be said about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The issue is complex, but what happened in Israel on Oct. 7 is unacceptable. It was no struggle for the freedom of Palestine. It was a well-planned massacre of innocent civilians. It was terrorism at its most brutal.
Hamas has proven that it is no different from the Islamic State group.
This is not just another round of combat. This is a major historic event that has global implications. If this unhuman cruelty happened in Israel, it can happen anywhere.
This is traumatic, as people can no longer feel safe in their own homes.
Israel is fighting for its existence and in this war against terrorism, no one should be indifferent.
Maya Yaron is Israel’s representative to Taiwan
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS