The newly established “mental health leave” works on three levels: counseling, sociology and even philosophy.
Elementary and middle-school students often find going to the counselor’s office in school difficult because doing so is considered a social taboo, and therefore embarrassing. Students who are asked to visit school counselors are often assumed to have misbehaved in some way. Furthermore, students who struggle with mental health problems and other difficulties are unlikely to be proactive in seeking out help and support.
National Taiwan University (NTU) has now implemented its new system for requesting mental health leave in what is a positive and healthy move for students. The problems college students encounter in their daily lives, studies, relationships and careers all have a significant impact on their lives and well-being. While NTU students might excel in their studies, that does not mean they are more capable of dealing with mental pressure than others.
Mental health leave aims to encourage students to seek help — not devalue themselves for exposing their mental issues — and find a way toward recovery through self-disclosure.
As for professors who demand class attendance, the system now provides a viable and open way for students to take leave for any mental health issues they might be experiencing. It also gives professors a chance to counsel students and allow time for self-care.
A student’s mental well-being needs support from the entire school. A college student’s mental state would improve only if more people are devoted to the support system.
With more students possessing healthier minds, Taiwan would have an even brighter future for generations to come.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Lee Chieh-yu
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at