China has recently been lambasting Japan for discharging treated water from the disaster-stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station into the ocean. China has also announced a complete ban on imports of aquatic products from Japan. Yet China’s sea, land and air are full of pollutants such as chemicals and heavy metals, and the water discharged from China’s nuclear power stations contains seven times the tritium of the water discharged from the Fukushima plant.
Food safety in China is poorly managed and its tap water is unsafe. With scandals over prohibited additives like melamine, malachite green and Sudan red, Chinese still often travel to Hong Kong to buy large quantities of everyday products, either for themselves or to resell for profit, which causes social and market disruptions in Hong Kong.
Furthermore, given China’s strict control on reporting, there is no way to know how many more food safety incidents have taken place, and the situation has not improved over the years. It is ironic for China to ban imports of Japanese aquatic products in the name of “food safety,” and the motive is clearly political.
The Japanese government has responded to public worries about radioactive tritium in the water discharged from the Fukushima plant by promising that the water has been processed through an advanced treatment system. The Japanese authorities have also taken ocean currents into account to minimize the impact on neighboring countries.
The International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that if the water is discharged in accordance with Japanese standards, it will not cause any noticeable harm to the environment.
Given that the sea is one of the most important resources on which Japanese depend for their livelihood, and that Japan is a democracy where the government is supervised by public opinion, the Japanese government is sure to carefully protect the marine environment and would never ignore international regulations as China sometimes does.
China is using the nuclear wastewater issue to deepen anti-Japanese sentiment among the Chinese public and divert attention from its own domestic economic crisis. Yet, by sowing fear with no regard for scientific data, China might be making trouble for itself.
Reports have emerged of Chinese stocking up on cooking salt to supposedly prevent any harm from Japan’s nuclear effluent, for which there is no scientific basis whatsoever. This panic stirred up by the government might do serious damage to China’s fishing industry by causing a fall in domestic demand. As well as having an impact on the economy, it would increase the burden of food imports. Pointless panic buying and stockpiling causes social and market disruption and can only harm the public’s livelihood.
Fear-mongering is also a cognitive warfare tactic that China uses against Taiwan. Previous examples include medical masks, vaccines and US-sourced pork. With regard to the current issue of water discharged from the Fukushima plant, China is using the international prestige of certain “Hong Kong experts,” who are actually being coerced under Hong Kong ’s National Security Law, in an attempt to erode the trust that exists between Taiwan, Hong Kong and Japan.
Spreading rumors that threaten social stability is not freedom of speech. Taiwan’s government should respond more strongly, such as blocking access to Chinese social media like Tik Tok and Xiaohongshu, thus cutting off China’s most direct channels for spreading rumors.
Hong Tsun-ming, originally from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Julian Clegg
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS