Last month was the Earth’s hottest ever, and the first week of this month saw the trend continue. The surging summer temperatures made me wonder: Just how much heat can the human body stand?
Deaths from heat are pretty common, and as the world heats up, they might become more so if we do not develop a plan for extreme heat days, like the kind of warning system that usually comes before a major hurricane or blizzard. In 2019, about 469,000 people worldwide died from overheating, a paper published in 2021 in The Lancet said.
Heat is sometimes called the silent killer, said Ollie Jay, director of the Heat and Health Research Incubator at the University of Sydney.
Illustration: kevin sheu
It does not make for dramatic television footage the way tsunamis and tornados and floods do.
“People who die are often old, they’re socially isolated, they’re living in low-income settings, they’re often not found for days after they’ve died,” Jay said.
We do not recognize the dangers.
Whether a given temperature can kill depends on humidity, wind velocity and direct exposure to sunlight, as well as a person’s level of exertion, body size and clothing. Temperatures reached 48°C where a man and his young stepson died hiking last month in Texas, but it was just 41°C when a young couple, their baby daughter, and the family dog all died in 2021 while hiking in California.
That California case was chronicled in the book The Heat Will Kill You First by Jeff Goodell. The young parents had brought what seemed like ample water. When they set out, the temperature was only in the 20s. They had planned to be home before the worst heat set in.
However, the hike started downhill. Getting back to their car required a 701m climb up a slope in direct sunlight. They never made it.
Heat can kill because our bodies are made of cells contained with membranes that, if hot enough, melt. While we think of ourselves as warm-blooded animals, biologists would call us homeothermic — we need to maintain a core temperature within a narrow range of 37°C.
Our core can get up to about 40°C for a short time without permanent damage, said Sam Cheuvront, a heat physiologist who has worked for the US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine. Exertion and external temperature both factor into our core temperature — and of course, so do fevers.
Our bodies cool off by sending blood to the skin, where it dissipates heat into the air. However, that only works until the air temperature is about 35°C, he said, which is as hot as your skin can get.
Then there is only one way to cool off, which is to sweat. The sweat is not what cools you — it is the process of sweat evaporating. If the humidity gets too high, the vapor pressure around you prevents evaporation and sweat pools and drips.
Humans start to cook in their own body heat at the equivalent of 35°C with 100 percent humidity. More vulnerable people can suffer heatstroke at lower temperatures.
Other factors also make a difference. People’s bodies heat up much faster in direct sun than in the same temperature in the shade. Air flow can help sweat evaporate and allow body heat to dissipate.
The majority of heat-related deaths are not due to heatstroke, Jay said.
The elderly and people with heart conditions are at greater risk of heart attacks, because the body’s cooling mechanisms create cardiovascular stress when pushed too hard. Others die of renal failure from a combination of blood being pulled away from the kidneys and dehydration.
Once the body’s core temperature starts to rise above 40°C, things get dangerous very fast. If it gets to 41°C, you are likely to suffer fatal heatstroke.
People can acclimate to heat over a few days in a hot place. They would start sweating more quickly, decrease their core temperature and increase fluid volume. However, eventually heat can override all these natural adaptations.
Jay said he has devised a five-level “heat stress” warning scale to alert people if the danger is low, moderate, high, very high or extreme.
These levels would be based on a combination of the temperature, wind, sun exposure and humidity to warn people when those factors line up in a deadly combination. Alerts could be sent to phones and sent out on television.
He said he is working with communities in Sydney, which can be one of the hottest places on the planet.
An interactive app could allow people to check the risk level of various activities such as running or hiking.
However, it is most important to reach the most vulnerable people, some of whom may need to get a more basic warning on television, Jay said.
In the 2021 paper, Jay detailed how alerts could be combined with other measures to help people whose homes or workplaces could get dangerously hot. Communities need air-conditioned common spaces, such as libraries, and systems for getting vulnerable people there during dangerous heat waves.
Trying to give everyone air conditioning is not the answer, since air conditioners spew additional heat into crowded cities, and are a major use of energy and source of carbon emissions.
A science-based heat-risk scale might also alert workers to danger and force employers to give outdoor workers a break when conditions are life-threatening. The US Congress might need to step in; as my Bloomberg Opinion colleague Mark Gongloff wrote, Texas just added a law that would allow employers to deny workers breaks for water and shade even in 46°C heat.
Heat has been killing people for decades — especially in cities acting as heat islands. As the Earth gets hotter, that would put more pressure on city officials to embrace heat warning systems, public cooling centers and science-based regulations aimed at preventing heat from killing us.
F.D. Flam is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering science. She is host of the Follow the Science podcast. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS