June 21 marked the 10th anniversary of the attempt to push the cross-strait services trade agreement through the legislature.
Ten years ago, under then-president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) pro-China administration, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) tried to sign the Faustian deal without consultation, an undemocratic move that ignited anger among students and others that turned into the Sunflower movement.
As a political star born out of the movement, former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), founder and chairman of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its presidential candidate, has the audacity to propose in a policy white paper that if elected president, he would restart talks on the services trade deal with China, and even an arrangement for trade in goods.
Ironically, while Ko was discussing social movements during a visit to Japan this month, he cited the Sunflower movement as an example, using it to encourage young people to “just do it” to become pioneers of social activism.
Why the U-turn?
It is clear that Ko is chasing his own political interests. New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, is facing a major slump in the polls over his response to allegations that kindergarten students had been drugged and criticism that he is a “cut and run” candidate — ie, campaigning for the presidency while still serving as mayor. Ko is using Hou’s woes to snatch support from the pan-blue camp.
For Ko to be elected, he has to rely on strategic voting by people who do not back the Democratic Progressive Party. Ko wants them to ditch Hou and vote for him, but his policy backtracking and betrayal of the Sunflower movement has exposed him as capricious, fickle and opportunistic.
In the white paper, Ko said that Taiwan should maintain “equidistant” relations with China and the US.
However, signing a cross-strait services and goods trade agreement would tilt Taiwan toward China economically and politically, and forfeit its sovereignty.
How could a pro-China treaty gel with Ko’s pursuit of “equidistant relations”?
Perhaps Ko is trying to follow in Ma’s footsteps, while forgetting that Ma’s approval rating at one point was as low as 9.2 percent.
When Bonnie Glaser, an expert on China, said that Beijing would be “more comfortable” supporting Ko than Hou, she must have hit a nerve, as Ko seemed compelled to twist her words and meaning.
Taiwanese must ask themselves before they vote whether Taiwan can afford to have a pro-China president in power and watch as he damages Taiwan’s democracy, economy and sovereignty.
More importantly, given Taiwan’s precarious situation, would it be able to of survive a “second Ma presidency” and the catastrophic consequences of pro-China policies?
Lai Yen-cheng is a doctoral candidate at National Yangming Chiao Tung University and a member of the university’s Gender Equity Education Committee.
Translated by Rita Wang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS