June 21 marked the 10th anniversary of the attempt to push the cross-strait services trade agreement through the legislature.
Ten years ago, under then-president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) pro-China administration, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) tried to sign the Faustian deal without consultation, an undemocratic move that ignited anger among students and others that turned into the Sunflower movement.
As a political star born out of the movement, former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), founder and chairman of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its presidential candidate, has the audacity to propose in a policy white paper that if elected president, he would restart talks on the services trade deal with China, and even an arrangement for trade in goods.
Ironically, while Ko was discussing social movements during a visit to Japan this month, he cited the Sunflower movement as an example, using it to encourage young people to “just do it” to become pioneers of social activism.
Why the U-turn?
It is clear that Ko is chasing his own political interests. New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, is facing a major slump in the polls over his response to allegations that kindergarten students had been drugged and criticism that he is a “cut and run” candidate — ie, campaigning for the presidency while still serving as mayor. Ko is using Hou’s woes to snatch support from the pan-blue camp.
For Ko to be elected, he has to rely on strategic voting by people who do not back the Democratic Progressive Party. Ko wants them to ditch Hou and vote for him, but his policy backtracking and betrayal of the Sunflower movement has exposed him as capricious, fickle and opportunistic.
In the white paper, Ko said that Taiwan should maintain “equidistant” relations with China and the US.
However, signing a cross-strait services and goods trade agreement would tilt Taiwan toward China economically and politically, and forfeit its sovereignty.
How could a pro-China treaty gel with Ko’s pursuit of “equidistant relations”?
Perhaps Ko is trying to follow in Ma’s footsteps, while forgetting that Ma’s approval rating at one point was as low as 9.2 percent.
When Bonnie Glaser, an expert on China, said that Beijing would be “more comfortable” supporting Ko than Hou, she must have hit a nerve, as Ko seemed compelled to twist her words and meaning.
Taiwanese must ask themselves before they vote whether Taiwan can afford to have a pro-China president in power and watch as he damages Taiwan’s democracy, economy and sovereignty.
More importantly, given Taiwan’s precarious situation, would it be able to of survive a “second Ma presidency” and the catastrophic consequences of pro-China policies?
Lai Yen-cheng is a doctoral candidate at National Yangming Chiao Tung University and a member of the university’s Gender Equity Education Committee.
Translated by Rita Wang
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
RSS