Recently, numerous sexual harassment and assault incidents have been exposed in Taiwan. The alledged offenders include public figures, elected representatives and school teachers at all levels.
Sexual harassment is different from sexual assault. In 2009, Taiwan enacted the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act (性騷擾防治法).
However, Article 13 of the act only states that a sexual harassment victim “can also propose a complaint against the defendant to the defendant’s organization, troop, school, institution, employer, or to the municipal and county (city) competent authorities where the defendant ... sets his or her domicile.”
In addition, the section on “compulsory indecency” in the Criminal Code overlaps with the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act.
Furthermore, if the victims are underage minors, they are protected by Article 97 of the Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act (兒童及少年福利與權益保障法). For these reasons, sexual harassment laws are difficult to enforce.
Therefore, the Legislative Yuan should amend these laws promptly.
First, it should clearly define sexual assault, sexual harassment and indecency.
Second, it should distinguish between adults and minors based on the ages of the victims. If such cases occur on campus, due to student age differences, the legality of the schools’ gender equality committee needs to be reviewed to avoid a situation where the criminal or civil judgement is not in line with the resolution of a school committee.
Besides, if a school’s gender equality committee found a teacher guilty of sexual harassment or sexual bullying, it would terminate the teacher’s employment and prohibit them from being hired as a teacher for life. The resolution is life-changing.
However, if later the teacher, after losing their job, were to be found not guilty in a criminal or civil lawsuit, the school would have to confront long-term legal disputes inimical to its operation.
If the legislature cannot address these problems, extending the statute of limitations for sexual harassment from one year to two years might be an alternative.
Liu Yung-chien is an educator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
RSS