Recently, numerous sexual harassment and assault incidents have been exposed in Taiwan. The alledged offenders include public figures, elected representatives and school teachers at all levels.
Sexual harassment is different from sexual assault. In 2009, Taiwan enacted the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act (性騷擾防治法).
However, Article 13 of the act only states that a sexual harassment victim “can also propose a complaint against the defendant to the defendant’s organization, troop, school, institution, employer, or to the municipal and county (city) competent authorities where the defendant ... sets his or her domicile.”
In addition, the section on “compulsory indecency” in the Criminal Code overlaps with the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act.
Furthermore, if the victims are underage minors, they are protected by Article 97 of the Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act (兒童及少年福利與權益保障法). For these reasons, sexual harassment laws are difficult to enforce.
Therefore, the Legislative Yuan should amend these laws promptly.
First, it should clearly define sexual assault, sexual harassment and indecency.
Second, it should distinguish between adults and minors based on the ages of the victims. If such cases occur on campus, due to student age differences, the legality of the schools’ gender equality committee needs to be reviewed to avoid a situation where the criminal or civil judgement is not in line with the resolution of a school committee.
Besides, if a school’s gender equality committee found a teacher guilty of sexual harassment or sexual bullying, it would terminate the teacher’s employment and prohibit them from being hired as a teacher for life. The resolution is life-changing.
However, if later the teacher, after losing their job, were to be found not guilty in a criminal or civil lawsuit, the school would have to confront long-term legal disputes inimical to its operation.
If the legislature cannot address these problems, extending the statute of limitations for sexual harassment from one year to two years might be an alternative.
Liu Yung-chien is an educator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS