On June 13, the Ministry of National Defense released the latest All-Out Defense Response Handbook. The updated handbook covers the techniques of telling friend from foe and accessing accurate information. While the military’s effort should be applauded, the Ministry of National Defense should consider the situation more from the civilians’ perspective, particularly in terms of differentiating friend from foe.
Here are some suggestions for the military:
First, senior military officers find it easy to tell Taiwan’s armed forces from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), even though all of them are in camouflage uniforms. On the other hand, civilians might not be able to distinguish between the two or tell the difference between uniforms of the Marine Corps from those of the army. The illustrations of camouflage uniforms should be clearer.
Second, elements of caricature in portraying soldiers should be removed, given that they might increase the difficulty in telling friend from foe. During wartime, the impression of caricatured soldiers would make it harder for Taiwanese to recognize the enemy.
Third, the portrayal of Taiwan’s armed forces and the PLA should be revised. The caricature of the former with a big smile and the latter with a pouting expression is unnecessary. This also shows a sense of complacency, which should be avoided.
Lastly, the ranks and lines on the camouflage uniforms are confusing. Civilians do not know much about the classification of our armed forces, and conscripted soldiers rarely have a chance to communicate with others in different ranks and lines. In this case, the illustration is redundant, and the military might want to eliminate it.
Hopefully, the All-Out Defense Response Handbook can be further edited to fulfill its purpose. It should be an emergency survival manual for every household and individual. The Ministry of National Defense should remove unnecessary details and make the handbook more accessible for the public, to boost people’s willingness to read it thoroughly and keep the important points in mind.
The military should not emphasize creativity too much only to please the media and the public, and it should not be satisfied with the current version. The All-Out Defense Response Handbook must be taken seriously.
Fang Ping-sheng is a former major in the Republic of China Marine Corps.
Translated by Emma Liu
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS