On Wednesday last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) nominated New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) as its candidate for next year’s presidential election.
In his speech, Hou repeatedly called for “another power transfer” without elaborating on what changes he and the KMT would bring to Taiwan if the party were to win. His call was nothing but a campaign slogan.
Based on the focus of discussion of pro-blue media and key opinion leaders over the past few years, there are at least three things that Hou should answer clearly and definitively as the KMT’s presidential candidate.
First, would he restart the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮)?
As the mayor, Hou has postponed the construction of dry storage facilities for the Second Nuclear Power Plant in the city’s Wanli District (萬里). As a result, there is not enough storage space for spent fuel rods at the plant.
He has also said numerous times that “without nuclear safety, there would be no nuclear energy.” Now, in the face of many pro-blue supporters and business groups’ calls to increase deployment of nuclear energy, he has the responsibility to explain what role nuclear power would play in his energy policy, and where nuclear waste would go.
Next, would he reverse the pension reforms for military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers?
Faced with a potential financial crisis, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration dealt with this “hot potato” that it inherited from former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, thus angering many of the these public servants and even their family members with the pension reductions.
Once a power transfer takes place, is Hou going to reverse the pension reform, or even retrospectively repay those whose pensions were cut? Many retirees are surely waiting for an answer from the mayor.
Last, would he maintain the current short-term military service?
In response to the growing military threat from the Chinese Communist Party, the Tsai administration announced at the end of last year that mandatory military service would from next year be extended from four months to one year. While the extension is good for national security and can reinforce allies’ confidence in Taiwan, it has become an excuse for critics to attack the Tsai administration and become a weapon for them to sensationalize the risks of a war.
The extension would also have an impact on conscripts’ career plans and deployment of massive national resources. However, it is representative of the government’s attitude in the face of Beijing’s military threats.
As a potential commander-in-chief of the nation’s armed forces, Hou should clarify whether he would make a U-turn on mandatory military service if he takes over the reins of government.
If Hou is not planning to restart the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project, cancel pension reforms and support the extension of military service, is there a need for a power transfer?
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher and a Kaohsiung resident.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
The Honduran elections seem to have put China on defense. The promises of trade and aid have failed to materialize, industries are frustrated, and leading candidate Salvador Nasralla, who has increased his lead in the polls, has caused Beijing to engage in a surge of activity that appears more like damage control than partnership building. As Nasralla’s momentum has grown, China’s diplomacy, which seems to be dormant since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 2023, has shown several attempts to avoid a reversal if the Liberal or the National party — which also favor Taipei — emerge as winners in the
RSS