If democracy had a doomsday clock, it would be at two minutes to midnight. Recent analysis by Varieties of Democracy showed that 72 percent of the world’s population lived in autocracies last year, compared with 50 percent a decade ago.
For the first time in more than two decades, there are more authoritarian regimes than liberal democracies — and not enough is being done to address this threat.
The reversal has been stunning. Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr won last year’s presidential election, 36 years after a popular revolt overthrew his father’s dictatorship. In Brazil, millions still refuse to accept former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro’s defeat to Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has forced its citizens to rise up against a genocidal occupier. In Egypt, the last vestiges of resistance to autocracy have been forced into the shadows.
On every continent, illiberal politicians are portraying democracy as an impractical historical relic.
More must be done to stop this rapid democratic backsliding. During World War II, when democracy was similarly threatened, the free world came together to create a more peaceful international order.
The multilateral system that was established in 1944 at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, and by the creation of the UN the following year, led to decades of relative stability and international cooperation on human rights.
The world is at a similar moment today — with an important twist. The conflict between autocracy and democracy is fought not only on the battlefield and in the political arena, but also on social media and broadcast television. If democracy is to prevail, credible, independent news media is essential.
Without trusted, impartial media, we cannot have shared facts. Without shared facts, we cannot have political accountability or fair elections. Without fair elections, democracy cannot survive.
However, just when it is most needed, fact-based, public-interest journalism is dying out.
The ongoing demise of advertising revenue has severely limited news outlets’ ability to inform citizens, hold the powerful to account and tell important stories.
The failure of journalism’s business model has led to two decades of collapsing revenues, cost cutting and layoffs.
Thousands of news organizations across the world have shut down, while political actors have acquired others as a vehicle for spreading propaganda.
China has spent an estimated US$6.6 billion since 2009 on strengthening its international media influence, and Russia spent at least US$1.5 billion last year on similar efforts.
International efforts to support independent journalism have been paltry in comparison.
A forthcoming report by the Center for International Media Assistance shows that such funding amounted to US$385 million in 2019 — about 0.3 percent of overseas development assistance.
This is woefully insufficient. Public and private funders must increase support for media organizations to at least 1 percent of global development assistance, providing an additional US$1 billion per year to support public-interest journalism.
The defining challenge of our time, saving democracy, must be a collective effort.
On March 30, US President Joe Biden’s administration held its second Summit for Democracy, which aimed to make democracies “more responsive and resilient.”
The first summit took place online in December 2021 and ended with several heads of state — including Biden, then-New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern and French President Emmanuel Macron — committing to provide support to the International Fund for Public Interest Media (IFPIM).
IFPIM is a first-of-its-kind multilateral institution seeking to boost the economic resilience of news outlets, and usher in a new paradigm for public-interest journalism within the next decade.
IFPIM has received financial contributions of almost US$50 million from 16 donors, including seven governments and nine firms and philanthropies.
Many of those funders are contributing meaningfully to global media for the first time. Since the last summit, IFPIM has funded 11 news outlets in 10 countries, including Brazil, Colombia, Niger, Tunisia and Ukraine.
However, those funds are still only a fraction of the billions of US dollars autocrats spend on strengthening their networks for disseminating disinformation.
This year, democratic states must step up and commit significant funds to scale up the support for independent media.
Wealthy democracies that have long understood the importance of a free press, such as G7 countries, must mobilize their resources to support the creation of a global information ecosystem that is more resilient to disinformation.
Private firms, which rely on accurate information to thrive, must take a prominent role in this effort by committing capital to fix the market failure that has weakened public-interest journalism.
Support for public-interest media is not nostalgia for some halcyon era. The ability to access real-time, accurate information is essential to a well-functioning democracy.
To defend against the rising tide of authoritarianism, fact-based news must be readily accessible to all. Liberal democracy’s doomsday clock is edging closer to midnight. Action is needed to prevent a long tyrannical darkness.
Maria Ressa, cofounder and cochair of the International Fund for Public Interest Media, received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2021 for her work as an investigative journalist in the Philippines. Nishant Lalwani is chief executive officer of the International Fund for Public Interest Media.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
RSS