Late last year, CNN Travel reported that Taiwan, a country renowned for its hospitality, sees many incidents of pedestrians being hit by vehicles that fail to give way at crosswalks, including many leading to injury or death.
CNN even called Taiwan a “living hell” for pedestrians. The term has resonated with the Taiwanese media and people, becoming a buzzword.
Faced with a “living hell” for pedestrians, the public expects the government to propose solutions to the problem.
The government can show its determination by outfitting more intersections with technology to discipline drivers who fail to give way to pedestrians, allowing the public to report unsafe driving and deploying more police officers to issue tickets for illegal parking.
Surprisingly, newly inaugurated Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) became the first local government head to address the issue when he announced that all motorcycles must immediately be removed from the city’s sidewalks.
He also said his administration would remove parking spaces for scooters that partly block the sidewalks along major roads in central Taipei, such as Dunhua N Road and Renai Road sections 1 and 2.
As a descendant of a notable family, Chiang perhaps does not need a motorcycle to get around Taipei and worry about parking. Maybe this is why he does not fully understand the importance of parking spaces for people who commute to work in central Taipei by scooter.
Authorities have for years allowed scooters to park on designated spaces at the edge of sidewalks. Most people who park on those spaces turn off the engine of their scooter before pushing it onto the sidewalk. The risk that they harm pedestrians is slim.
As Taipei is tackling the “living hell” for pedestrians, it unfortunately stigmatizes all motorcyclists. It is the wrong solution to a pressing problem, and it shows that the Chiang administration needs to work harder to draft its policies.
Fan Shuo-ming is a senior administrative specialist at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS