Late last year, CNN Travel reported that Taiwan, a country renowned for its hospitality, sees many incidents of pedestrians being hit by vehicles that fail to give way at crosswalks, including many leading to injury or death.
CNN even called Taiwan a “living hell” for pedestrians. The term has resonated with the Taiwanese media and people, becoming a buzzword.
Faced with a “living hell” for pedestrians, the public expects the government to propose solutions to the problem.
The government can show its determination by outfitting more intersections with technology to discipline drivers who fail to give way to pedestrians, allowing the public to report unsafe driving and deploying more police officers to issue tickets for illegal parking.
Surprisingly, newly inaugurated Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) became the first local government head to address the issue when he announced that all motorcycles must immediately be removed from the city’s sidewalks.
He also said his administration would remove parking spaces for scooters that partly block the sidewalks along major roads in central Taipei, such as Dunhua N Road and Renai Road sections 1 and 2.
As a descendant of a notable family, Chiang perhaps does not need a motorcycle to get around Taipei and worry about parking. Maybe this is why he does not fully understand the importance of parking spaces for people who commute to work in central Taipei by scooter.
Authorities have for years allowed scooters to park on designated spaces at the edge of sidewalks. Most people who park on those spaces turn off the engine of their scooter before pushing it onto the sidewalk. The risk that they harm pedestrians is slim.
As Taipei is tackling the “living hell” for pedestrians, it unfortunately stigmatizes all motorcyclists. It is the wrong solution to a pressing problem, and it shows that the Chiang administration needs to work harder to draft its policies.
Fan Shuo-ming is a senior administrative specialist at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS