Thu, Jan 12, 2023 page8

• China faces bad winter with virus

  • By Nancy Qian 錢楠筠
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Last month, China ended its “zero COVID-19” policy, bringing a tumultuous end to restrictions after nearly three years. The suddenness of the move surprised nearly everyone. The process could have been much more gradual, with a slower shift from mass forced lockdowns to more flexible policies, such as voluntary self-quarantine and social distancing. Instead, Beijing has effectively thrown caution to the wind.

  As a result, China is now having one of the worst outbreaks seen anywhere since the start of the pandemic. Hundreds of millions of people have been infected in the space of just a few weeks and many experts now expect the death toll to exceed 1 million. Chinese social media are being flooded with harrowing accounts of personal loss and images of overwhelmed hospitals. While the exact infection and mortality figures are unclear, the big picture is undeniable: Chinese are fighting to survive.

  The situation is reminiscent of what many other countries experienced in the first weeks of the pandemic, but unlike in most developed economies, key features of China’s social and economic structure make it especially difficult for ordinary households to grapple with the virus.

  Reducing infection rates in high-risk populations, for example, requires self-distancing, which is why elderly people in advanced economies have voluntarily reduced interactions with their children and grandchildren.

  However, elderly people in China cannot self-isolate so easily, because many are their grandchildren’s primary caregivers.

  In 2013, the Shanghai Municipal Population and Family Planning Commission reported that 90 percent of the city’s young children were being cared for by at least one grandparent. The rates are lower in other cities, but still much higher than in the US. More than 50 percent of all Chinese grandparents provide care for their grandchildren, whereas only 3.8 percent of American grandparents do.

  This difference is partly a result of tradition. Many elderly Chinese live with their adult children and retirement homes in the country are still rare. Economic conditions also play an important role. In urban areas, parents increasingly need grandparents to help them with child rearing, owing to the taxing work schedule of 9am to 9pm six days per week and a brutally competitive education system.

  Moreover, China has experienced a tripling of grandparent-grandchild (skipped-generation) households since 1990. Because the hundreds of millions of Chinese who migrate to cities for work are prohibited from bringing their families with them, about 60 million children remain in rural areas with grandparents and other relatives.

  Many urban parents, too, have left their children behind. In cities, children often live with grandparents who own property in city centers, where the best schools and other amenities are. Today’s urban elderly were grandfathered into these sought-after locations, having been assigned housing by their work units before the reforms of the mid-1990s transferred ownership from the state to the occupants.

  As urban housing prices have skyrocketed, the beneficiaries’ adult children have been forced out to more affordable suburbs. In Shanghai, where real-estate prices are the third-highest in the world, grandparents are the sole caregivers of 45 percent of the city’s young children.

  When Chinese do become infected or fall dangerously ill, they seek emergency care as a last resort and their access to effective care is much more limited than in higher-income countries. As of 2021, China’s per capita GDP was just US$12,556 — less than one-fifth that of US$70,248 in the US. This large income gap is reflected in the provision of public healthcare, including in ways that are not always apparent.

  For example, although China and the US have a comparable number of hospital beds and physicians per person, such indicators mask a lower quality of care. Most Chinese hospital rooms are shared by many patients, which poses obvious problems in the case of a contagious outbreak. Worse still, last year China had only four intensive-care-unit (ICU) beds per 100,000 people on average, compared with more than 30 per 100,000 in the US.

  China’s limited public resources also are reflected in the high price of treatments. In the US, the government purchased 20 million courses of Paxlovid at US$530 each and provided them to Americans free of charge. In China, patients must buy Paxlovid at the market price of US$426.80 per course, which amounts to 8.3 percent of the average annual disposable income — US$5,092. For comparison, this would be like asking the average American to pay US$4,034.

  In the months ahead, these issues are likely to become more problematic as migrant workers spread the virus to the rural population when they return home for the Lunar New Year next week. Home to about 500 million people, China’s rural areas have even more multigenerational households, and they are generally poorer, with only half the number of beds per hospital, and very few ICU units. As such, many fear that rural China is heading for a “dark COVID-19 winter.”

  The pandemic began in China during the 2020 Lunar New Year holidays. Now, for the first time in three years, Chinese can see a small light at the end of the tunnel. However, the last mile will be grueling. Households must do their best to protect themselves with limited access to some of the most important tools for fighting the disease. While there is little doubt that returning to normalcy is the right direction for China, the days and weeks ahead are going to be exceedingly difficult and full of sorrow.

  Nancy Qian, a professor of managerial economics and decision sciences at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management in Evanston, Illinois, is a codirector of the university’s Global Poverty Research Lab and founding director of the China Econ Lab.

  Copyright: Project Syndicate
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Registration for NT$10,000 to open on Nov. 5

  • 2

    MOFA rejects ‘Time’ ‘reckless leader’ label

  • 3

    Taiwan in Time: The breakfast that sparked Taiwan’s semiconductor revolution

  • 4

    NT$10,000 cash handout explainer

  • 5

    Criticism to motivate Yamal: Barca assistant