Residents of Tainan’s Annan District (安南) recently became aware of a new gas-fired power plant scheduled to be built just north of their homes.
Local investigations revealed that Taiwan Sugar Co is to lease a 25.9 hectare site to Jiu Wei Power Co, and that the correct procedures have not been followed for the implementation of such a project. Inquiries showed that there is considerable doubt about the suitability of the proposed site.
First, there are already two power stations affecting air quality in Tainan in particular and southern Taiwan in general. The proposed site is also uncomfortably close to the National Museum of Taiwan History, a new multibillion-dollar quadruple baseball stadium development, Annan Hospital, numerous historic temples, dozens of schools and the natural habitat for a rare species of owl. The site of a new local government development scheme that includes 1,500 social housing units is also just 800m from the planned power plant.
Questions have been raised about what kind of planning committee would agree to such a thoughtless idea. Clearly, profit was the priority, while the health and welfare of residents was a secondary concern. Those in favor of the planned power plant, and those most likely to profit from it, could well argue that there is an element of NIMBYism (“not in my backyard”) in play, but local residents are rightly concerned about another power plant being constructed close to their homes, schools, temples and workplaces. The proposed site would directly affect a large residential area, with the area to its east overlapping substantially with the area affected by one of the existing plants. Those unfortunate enough to live in that zone would be at an even greater risk of having to live with poor air quality.
Taiwan has a dismal air pollution record.
On the positive side, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) recently announced her commitment to a carbon-neutral Taiwan by 2050, but it is not unreasonable to suspect that this was not considered in the planning of the new power plant. It would not be difficult to find a more suitable location, one at which the plant would have a less impact on the surrounding environment.
Better still, further investment in clean energy would undoubtedly sit more comfortably with international concerns about global warming. There are several wind farms off the northwest coast, and Tainan, too, is subject to strong winds almost all year round. Meanwhile, the use of solar energy is also becoming more widespread in Taiwan, and the technology is improving rapidly. There are some significant solar power sites in or near Tainan, as the city has an abundance of sunshine. The wind in Tainan comes from the north for much of the year, so the air affected by power production along the west coast is carried directly to the city.
The new power plant would apparently provide energy to the Southern Taiwan Science Park (南部科學園區), which is northeast of the proposed site, meaning that the park would be less affected by its air pollution. Finally, the parent company of the proposed plant has proudly expressed its concerns for the environment. Its Web site says that it “refuse[s] to install ... power system [sic] on good farmland and woodlands.” This contradicts the site being considered Grade 1 farmland. How can the firm consider the site appropriate for the project?
Questions have been raised and appeals have been made, and decisions should be reviewed and answers should be forthcoming. To date, those in positions of power have not given any meaningful answers, and the concerns and protests of residents have not been addressed. The year 2050 is fast approaching. The authorities could seize this moment to make changes for the better, thereby improving the chances of achieving the government’s ambitious target. Taiwanese, not to mention the planet, deserve better.
Ming Turner is an associate professor in the Institute of Creative Industries Design and Head of Visual and Performance Arts at the National Cheng Kung University Art Center.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) was on Monday last week invited to give a talk to students of Soochow University, but her responses to questions raised by students and lecturers became a controversial incident and sparked public discussion over the following days. The student association of the university’s Department of Political Science, which hosted the event, on Saturday issued a statement urging people to stop “doxxing,” harassing and attacking the students who raised questions at the event, and called for rational discussion of the talk. Criticism should be directed at viewpoints, opinions or policies, not students, they said, adding
RSS