Residents of Tainan’s Annan District (安南) recently became aware of a new gas-fired power plant scheduled to be built just north of their homes.
Local investigations revealed that Taiwan Sugar Co is to lease a 25.9 hectare site to Jiu Wei Power Co, and that the correct procedures have not been followed for the implementation of such a project. Inquiries showed that there is considerable doubt about the suitability of the proposed site.
First, there are already two power stations affecting air quality in Tainan in particular and southern Taiwan in general. The proposed site is also uncomfortably close to the National Museum of Taiwan History, a new multibillion-dollar quadruple baseball stadium development, Annan Hospital, numerous historic temples, dozens of schools and the natural habitat for a rare species of owl. The site of a new local government development scheme that includes 1,500 social housing units is also just 800m from the planned power plant.
Questions have been raised about what kind of planning committee would agree to such a thoughtless idea. Clearly, profit was the priority, while the health and welfare of residents was a secondary concern. Those in favor of the planned power plant, and those most likely to profit from it, could well argue that there is an element of NIMBYism (“not in my backyard”) in play, but local residents are rightly concerned about another power plant being constructed close to their homes, schools, temples and workplaces. The proposed site would directly affect a large residential area, with the area to its east overlapping substantially with the area affected by one of the existing plants. Those unfortunate enough to live in that zone would be at an even greater risk of having to live with poor air quality.
Taiwan has a dismal air pollution record.
On the positive side, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) recently announced her commitment to a carbon-neutral Taiwan by 2050, but it is not unreasonable to suspect that this was not considered in the planning of the new power plant. It would not be difficult to find a more suitable location, one at which the plant would have a less impact on the surrounding environment.
Better still, further investment in clean energy would undoubtedly sit more comfortably with international concerns about global warming. There are several wind farms off the northwest coast, and Tainan, too, is subject to strong winds almost all year round. Meanwhile, the use of solar energy is also becoming more widespread in Taiwan, and the technology is improving rapidly. There are some significant solar power sites in or near Tainan, as the city has an abundance of sunshine. The wind in Tainan comes from the north for much of the year, so the air affected by power production along the west coast is carried directly to the city.
The new power plant would apparently provide energy to the Southern Taiwan Science Park (南部科學園區), which is northeast of the proposed site, meaning that the park would be less affected by its air pollution. Finally, the parent company of the proposed plant has proudly expressed its concerns for the environment. Its Web site says that it “refuse[s] to install ... power system [sic] on good farmland and woodlands.” This contradicts the site being considered Grade 1 farmland. How can the firm consider the site appropriate for the project?
Questions have been raised and appeals have been made, and decisions should be reviewed and answers should be forthcoming. To date, those in positions of power have not given any meaningful answers, and the concerns and protests of residents have not been addressed. The year 2050 is fast approaching. The authorities could seize this moment to make changes for the better, thereby improving the chances of achieving the government’s ambitious target. Taiwanese, not to mention the planet, deserve better.
Ming Turner is an associate professor in the Institute of Creative Industries Design and Head of Visual and Performance Arts at the National Cheng Kung University Art Center.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS