Recall the story about the explorer who encounters an aboriginal tribe for the first time.
“Are there cannibals among you?” he asks.
“No,” they reply. “We ate the last one yesterday.”
Illustration: Yusha
To constitute a civilized community by eating the last cannibal, the final act must be called something else. It is a kind of original sin that must be erased from memory.
Similarly, the transition to a modern legal order in the US’ “Wild West” was accomplished through brutal crimes and the creation of myths to cover them up. As a character in the John Ford western The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance put it: “When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.”
However, the “facts” that are born of legends are not verifiable truths. Rather, they are social artifacts: shared ideas that form the basis of the actually existing sociopolitical order. If enough people were to reject them, the entire order would disintegrate.
These social artifacts allow a society’s original sins to remain in the background, where they continue operating silently because modern civilization still relies on barbarism. Recall how the legal apparatus of power was used to sanction the extralegal practice of torture by calling it “enhanced interrogation.”
Yet now, a new type of political dispensation is emerging. As the philosopher Alenka Zupancic observes in her new book, Let Them Rot (on which I rely here extensively), we increasingly have leaders who take pride in their crimes “as if it amounted to some kind of fundamental moral difference or difference of character, namely, ‘having the courage,’ ‘the guts,’ to do it openly.”
Zupancic hastens to add: “What may appear to be their courageous transgression of state laws by avoiding the ‘hypocrisy’ that those laws sometimes demand is nothing more than a direct identification with the obscene other side of state power itself. It does not amount to anything else or different.
They are ‘transgressing’ their own laws. This is why, even when they are in power, these leaders continue to act as if they are in opposition to the existing power, rebelling against it — call it the ‘deep state’ or something else.”
Obviously, this description summons up images of former US president Donald Trump, who just this month called for the “termination” of the US constitution.
Of course, appearances have also been disintegrating in Russia. For 10 months, Russian President Vladimir Putin insisted that there was no war in Ukraine, and ordinary Russians risked criminal prosecution for suggesting otherwise. Now, Putin has broken his own rule and acknowledged that Russia is at war.
Likewise, Yevgeny Prigozhin, a Putin crony, long denied that he had anything to do with the Wagner Group of Russian mercenaries. He has now admitted that he founded the group, and that he has interfered in US elections and would continue to do so.
For political figures like Trump and Putin, courage is redefined as a willingness to break the state’s laws if the state’s own interests — or their own — demand it. The implication is that civilization endures only if there are brave patriots who will do the dirty work.
This is a decidedly right-wing form of “heroism.” It is easy to act nobly on behalf of one’s country — short of sacrificing one’s life for it — but only the strong of heart can bring themselves to commit crimes for it.
Hence, in 1943, Heinrich Himmler, the architect of the Holocaust, spoke of “a chapter of glory in our history which has never been written, and which never shall be written.” The question was what do with Jewish women and children.
“I decided here to find a completely clear solution,” Himmler told a gathering of SS officers. “I did not regard myself as justified in exterminating the men ... and to allow the avengers in the shape of the children to grow up for our sons and grandchildren. The difficult decision had to be taken to have this people disappear from the Earth.”
In today’s Russia, the idea that atrocities “never shall be written” is increasingly out of fashion. Far from ignoring the eating of cannibals, such acts are being enshrined into law.
On Dec. 14 last year, the Duma adopted a bill stating that any atrocities committed in Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson before those Ukrainian regions’ annexation “will not be considered a crime punishable by law” if they are deemed to have been “in the interest of the Russian Federation.”
How this determination will be made is unclear, but it is safe to assume that all the torture, rape, murder, looting and vandalism committed by Russian forces would be excused — even celebrated.
One is reminded of the paradox in Sophocles’ Antigone, in which it is riskier to obey morality than to become complicit in criminality.
“Russian culture” has become “a collateral victim of Putin’s self-devouring cannibalism,” historian Timothy Garton Ash said.
“The time has come to ask whether, objectively speaking, Vladimir Putin is an agent of American imperialism. For no American has ever done half as much damage to what Putin calls the ‘Russian world’ as the Russian leader himself has,” he said.
Offering a similar analysis, Kazakh journalist Arman Shuraev recently excoriated Russia’s bullying ambassador to his country: “Russophobia is all that you have achieved with your stupid actions... You are idiots. You are cannibals who eat themselves.”
Paradoxically, Russia’s exercise in false transparency makes the mystifications of state power even more dangerous, by eroding our moral sensitivities. It shows why we need figures such as WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange more than ever.
Assange is our Antigone. For years, he has been kept in an undead, isolated state, awaiting extradition to the US for serving as a spy for the people, making public just one small part of the obscene dark side of US policy. Although Assange might have done some problematic things, my wish for the New Year is that US President Joe Biden will show true courage and drop the charges against him.
Slavoj Zizek, a professor of philosophy at the European Graduate School, is the international director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities at the University of London and author, most recently, of Heaven in Disorder.
Copyright: Project Syndicate.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS