The Chinese communist Party’s cruel and abusive Zero-COVID lockdown policy has been a disaster. At home, it has brought incalculable suffering to the Chinese people, while abroad it has made the country a laughingstock to the rest of the world. Since the outbreak of the pandemic, the Chinese people have been compelled to adhere to this draconian policy, conceived and orchestrated by Xi Jinping (習近平). Xi showed no signs of brooking compromises or changing course, despite the calamity he brought to the nation.
However, over the last couple of weeks, we have seen Xi’s resolve shaken by mass protests throughout China. Faced with nationwide outrage, Xi had no alternative but to implement a set of humiliating compromises in the interest of maintaining the stability of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) authoritarian regime. Inexplicably, the Zero-COVID policy that had been in place for the length of the pandemic came tumbling down overnight, with restrictions and regulations suddenly relaxed throughout China.
This is what dictatorships are like: they govern with an iron fist, but with it they also tend to go where the wind blows. They can be ferocious and draconian one day and flip 180 degrees the next if they sense a challenge to their monopoly of power. They care little for consistency and severe consequence of drastic and swift policy swings without adequate preparation, so long as their dictatorship prolongs and prospers.
There is nothing surprising about the failure of Zero-COVID policy. In fact, it mirrors similar CCP policy disasters. It is comparable to two other policy abominations: the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. They might differ in the scale and magnitude of the suffering that they wrought on the people, but their inherent logic, their modus operandi, and their development are remarkably identical.
What the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, and Zero-COVID have in common, is their stupefying hubris. They assume the Party and its supreme leader are so powerful and capable, that with an order they can eradicate all the vermin, pests, sparrows, “revisionists,” and viruses they choose not to like.
The Great Leap Forward was motivated by Mao’s desire to see China surpass Britain and catch up with the US within a short period of time. The Cultural Revolution was to continue the communist revolution by opposing revisionism abroad and preventing it at home. Zero-COVID, for its part, is to reduce infections to zero nationwide. All three lunacies are meant to showcase the Chinese communists’ all-encompassing greatness.
From the outset of the COVID outbreak in Wuhan, Xi has stuck to his plan, which he perceives to be superior to those adopted by advanced industrial democracies. As a result, he has ignored common sense and science, causing immense human suffering. Supremely confident in his approach, Xi sought to position himself and the CCP’s model for pandemic response as a beacon of salvation for the rest of the world. The CCP would lead us all out of the deadly pandemic, garnering praise for Beijing and the Supreme Leader, guiding us ever closer to fulfilling the common destiny of mankind under the CCP’s brilliant leadership.
These dramatic aims appear quite silly as the virus proves to be smarter than the severely under-educated Xi. But the supreme leader however could not admit the failure of his policy, and thus, he made support for Zero-COVID a test of every party member’s loyalty to him, the Party, and ultimately the communist cause. To oppose the Zero-COVID policy is to oppose Xi; to oppose Xi is to oppose the Party; and to oppose the Party is to oppose communism itself.
It is little wonder, then, that senior CCP officials, well aware of Xi’s capacity for ruthless purges, would prostrate themselves before him and keep silent about the absurdity and inhumanity of Zero-COVID. No senior CCP leader has openly uttered any meaningful objection to Xi’s lunacy. The only real opposition has come from outside the Communist Party, from the angry, loud and brave protesters in the streets, in all the major cities and metropolises across the country.
The nationwide protests, unprecedented since 1989, threatened the stability of the CCP’s power. But there is another situation that compelled Xi to make the inevitable compromise: his Zero-COVID lockdowns have ruined the Chinese economy, the world’s second largest.
Like Mao’s Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, Xi’s Zero-COVID policy had brought the Chinese economy to the brink of collapse. Under Zero-COVID, millions of ordinary people lost their jobs and millions of businesses were forced to shut down. Production in China, the world’s factory, came to a shuddering halt. Virtually all the foreign companies operating in Guangdong’s Dongguan City, the world’s largest manufacturing base, including Sanyo, Panasonic, Sony, Nokia, Canon, Epson and Cisco, have fled.
The Zero-COVID lockdowns led to a mass exodus of employees and a shutdown of production at the Foxconn factory in Zhengzhou, which produces 80 percent of the world’s Apple phones, and Apple has been forced to look outside of China for other production bases to expedite its flight from China. With Christmas just around the corner, orders from around the world to the hobbled Chinese factories are down by nearly 40 percent. Within China, November 11th, the biggest consumer day in the country, known as Singles Day in China, saw sales drop by 42 percent.
Investor confidence in Chinese companies has plummeted, causing the stocks of almost all the leading Chinese companies like Alibaba and Tencent to fall at an unprecedented rate. The central, provincial, and local governments have wasted enormous resources building huge concentration camp-style mobile cabin hospitals, Orwellian rapid-testing stations, and all manner of control mechanisms to keep the costly Zero-COVID policy running. Zero-COVID has run the finances of every province in China into the red.
In short, Zero-COVID has shattered the myth of the CCP’s economic miracle. Just like Mao during the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, Xi has managed to once again bring China’s economy to near collapse.
Like Mao’s Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, Xi’s Zero-COVID policy has fostered deep suspicion and distrust of the CCP and of the prudence and competence of China’s leaders, not just in the eyes of the Chinese people, but throughout the world.
Xi had intended to display to the world the glory and superiority of the CCP and China’s socialist system, but this backfired miserably. All Zero-COVID proved in the end was the arrogance, incompetence, stupidity, and cruelty of the communist system, and the protests demonstrated the disappointment, desperation, and anger of the people toward their rulers. When repression deepens, the Chinese people want to flee, en masse.
On Dec. 6, the day after the sudden relaxation of the Zero-COVID policy, the most searched phrase on WeChat by Chinese people was “emigration” (移民), with over 116 million entries. The philosophy of the CCP is the philosophy of “struggle,” while the philosophy of the Chinese people under CCP rule is either the philosophy of “lying flat” (躺平),a pervasive form of passive resistance and disengagement with the CCP, or the philosophy of “RUN” (潤), a phonetic adaptation of the English word “run,” to mean the study of how to flee from China.
Given how flagrantly incompetent and callous the CCP has proven itself, what right does it have to think it can achieve “the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation”?
Miles Yu served as the senior China policy and planning advisor to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo during the Trump Administration.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS