Political science professor Yang Tai-shuenn (楊泰順), who in the 1990s stood as a New Party candidate for the Taiwan Provincial Council and was duly elected, published an article on Nov. 27, the day after the local government elections, titled: “The importance of the nine-in-one elections is exaggerated.”
“The election results are not useful for forecasting the outcome of the presidential and legislative elections in two years’ time,” Yang said. “Policy decisions in Taiwan are highly concentrated at the central government level, and, given that the legislature is in no position to hinder government policies, even though the governing party has lost the nine-in-one local elections, it will not be hard for it, within the next two years, to create enough of a favorable environment to turn the situation around. The 2018 nine-in-one elections are a case in point.”
Frankly, this is common knowledge. People who care about politics and remember a little history all understand this point, and also know that Taiwanese tend to vote differently in local and central government elections.
However, on seeing the reactions of media commentators of various political leanings the day after the elections, either celebrating success or reflecting on failure, and even pointing the finger at whomever they thought was to blame, I kept wondering whether they were taking it too far.
For example, the United Daily News, which published Yang’s article, also published a mini-editorial titled: “The anti-China card has failed this time.”
Was this just a matter of self-congratulation, or more a case of underestimating the intelligence of the paper’s readers?
Besides, figures announced by the Central Election Commission showed that the voter turnout was 59.96 percent in the elections for municipal mayors and 64.2 percent in the elections for mayors and county commissioners, respectively 6.25 and 4.67 percent lower than the previous local elections in 2018.
This adds up to quite a stunning difference of more than 1 million voters, not to mention that about 40 percent of voters did not vote at all. Set against the 74.9 percent turnout in the 2020 presidential election, it is even more incomparable.
In view of all this, when so-called experts try to analyze public opinion, or when supporters of the “pan-green” Taiwan-centric parties are sighing and sobbing, they should at least look at the numbers first, rather than jumping to conclusions.
Kang Yu-tsai is an adjunct professor.
Translated by Julian Clegg
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS