A new chatbot from OpenAI took the Internet by storm this week, dashing off poems, screenplays and essay answers that were plastered as screenshots all over Twitter by the breathless technoratti.
Although the underlying technology has been around for a few years, this was the first time OpenAI brought its powerful language-generating system known as GPT3 to the masses, prompting a race to give it the most inventive commands. My favorite is, “Write a Biblical verse explaining how to remove a peanut butter sandwich from a VCR.”
Beyond the gimmicky demos, some people are already finding practical uses for ChatGPT — including programers who are using it to draft code or spot errors — but the system’s biggest utility could be a financial disaster for Google by supplying superior answers to the queries we currently put to the world’s most powerful search engine.
Google works by crawling billions of Web pages, indexing that content and then ranking it in order of the most relevant answers. It then spits out a list of links to click through. ChatGPT offers something more tantalizing for harried Internet users: A single answer based on its own search and synthesis of that information.
ChatGPT has been trained on millions of Web sites to glean not only the skill of holding a humanlike conversation, but information itself, so long as it was published on the Internet before late last year.
COMPARING SEARCHES
I went through my own Google search history over the past month and put 18 of my Google queries into ChatGPT, cataloging the answers. I then went back and ran the queries through Google once more, to refresh my memory. The end result was, in my judgment, that ChatGPT’s answers were more useful than Google’s in 13 out of the 18 examples.
“Useful” is of course subjective. What do I mean by the term? In this case, answers that were clear and comprehensive. A query about whether condensed milk or evaporated milk was better for pumpkin pie during Thanksgiving sparked a detailed — if slightly verbose — answer from ChatGPT that explained how condensed milk would lead to a sweeter pie. (Naturally, that was superior.) Google mainly provided a list of links to recipes I would have to click around, with no clear answer.
That underscores ChatGPT’s prime threat to Google down the line. It gives a single, immediate response that requires no further scanning of other Web sites. In Silicon Valley speak, that is a “frictionless” experience, something of a holy grail when online consumers overwhelmingly favor services that are quick and easy to use.
Google does have its own version of summarized answers to some queries, but they are compilations of the highest-ranked Web pages and typically brief. It also has its own proprietary language model, called LaMDA, which is so good that one of the company’s engineers thought the system was sentient.
Google does not generate its own singular answers to queries because anything that prevents people from scanning search results is going to hurt Google’s transactional business model of getting people to click on ads. About 81 percent of Alphabet Inc’s US$257.6 billion revenue last year came from advertising, much of that being Google’s pay-per-click ads, data compiled by Bloomberg showed.
“It’s all designed with the purpose of ‘Let’s get you to click on a link,’” said Sridhar Ramaswamy, who oversaw Google’s ads and commerce business from 2013 to 2018, adding that generative search from systems like ChatGPT would disrupt Google’s traditional search business “in a massive way.”
“It’s just a better experience,” he said. “The goal of Google search is to get you to click on links, ideally ads, and all other text on the page is just filler.”
Ramaswamy cofounded a subscription-based search engine called Neeva in 2019, which is planning to roll out its own generative search feature that can summarize Web pages, with footnotes, in the coming months.
ChatGPT does not reveal the sources of its information. In fact, there is a good chance its own creators cannot tell how it generates the answers it comes up with. That points to one of its biggest weaknesses: Sometimes, its answers are plain wrong.
Stack Overflow, a question-and-answer site for coders, on Monday temporarily banned its users from sharing advice from ChatGPT, saying that the thousands of answers that programmers were posting from the system were often incorrect.
My own experience bears this out. When I put my 12-year-old daughter’s English essay question into the system, it offered a long and eloquent analysis that sounded authoritative — but the answer was also riddled with mistakes, for instance stating that a literary character’s parents had died when they had not.
CONFIDENT BUT WRONG
What is disturbing about this flaw is that the inaccuracies are hard to spot, especially when ChatGPT sounds so confident.
The system’s answers “typically look like they might be good,” according to Stack Overflow, and by OpenAI’s own admission, they are often plausible sounding.
OpenAI had initially trained its system to be more cautious, but the result was that it declined questions it knew the answer to. By going the other way, the result is something like a college frat student bluffing their way through an essay after not studying. Fluent hogwash.
It is unclear how common ChatGPT’s mistakes are. One estimate doing the rounds on Twitter is a rate of 2 to 5 percent. It might be more. That could make Internet users wary of using ChatGPT for important information.
Another strength for Google: It mostly makes money on transactional search queries for products, and navigational searches for other sites, such as people typing in “Facebook” or “YouTube.”
Those kinds of queries comprised many of the top 100 Google searches this year. So long as ChatGPT does not offer links to other sites, it is not encroaching too deeply on Google’s turf.
However, those issues could evolve over time. ChatGPT could become more accurate as OpenAI expands the training of its model to more current parts of the Web. To that end, OpenAI is working on a system called WebGPT, which it hopes leads to more accurate answers to search queries, which would include source citations.
A combination of ChatGPT and WebGPT could be a powerful alternative to Google, and ChatGPT is already giving more accurate answers than OpenAI’s earlier systems.
ChatGPT amassed 1 million users in about five days. That is an extraordinary milestone. It took Instagram 2.5 months to reach that number, and 10 months for Facebook.
OpenAI is not publicly speculating about its future applications, but if its new chatbot starts sharing links to other Web sites, particularly those that sell things, that could spell real danger for Google.
Parmy Olson is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology, and a former reporter for the Wall Street Journal and Forbes.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
There is a modern roadway stretching from central Hargeisa, the capital of Somaliland in the Horn of Africa, to the partially recognized state’s Egal International Airport. Emblazoned on a gold plaque marking the road’s inauguration in July last year, just below the flags of Somaliland and the Republic of China (ROC), is the road’s official name: “Taiwan Avenue.” The first phase of construction of the upgraded road, with new sidewalks and a modern drainage system to reduce flooding, was 70 percent funded by Taipei, which contributed US$1.85 million. That is a relatively modest sum for the effect on international perception, and
At the end of last year, a diplomatic development with consequences reaching well beyond the regional level emerged. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared Israel’s recognition of Somaliland as a sovereign state, paving the way for political, economic and strategic cooperation with the African nation. The diplomatic breakthrough yields, above all, substantial and tangible benefits for the two countries, enhancing Somaliland’s international posture, with a state prepared to champion its bid for broader legitimacy. With Israel’s support, Somaliland might also benefit from the expertise of Israeli companies in fields such as mineral exploration and water management, as underscored by Israeli Minister of
When former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) first took office in 2016, she set ambitious goals for remaking the energy mix in Taiwan. At the core of this effort was a significant expansion of the percentage of renewable energy generated to keep pace with growing domestic and global demands to reduce emissions. This effort met with broad bipartisan support as all three major parties placed expanding renewable energy at the center of their energy platforms. However, over the past several years partisanship has become a major headwind in realizing a set of energy goals that all three parties profess to want. Tsai
On Sunday, elite free solo climber Alex Honnold — famous worldwide for scaling sheer rock faces without ropes — climbed Taipei 101, once the world’s tallest building and still the most recognizable symbol of Taiwan’s modern identity. Widespread media coverage not only promoted Taiwan, but also saw the Republic of China (ROC) flag fluttering beside the building, breaking through China’s political constraints on Taiwan. That visual impact did not happen by accident. Credit belongs to Taipei 101 chairwoman Janet Chia (賈永婕), who reportedly took the extra step of replacing surrounding flags with the ROC flag ahead of the climb. Just
RSS