China’s “zero COVID-19” policy is unscientific, inhumane and autocratic. It has caused great human suffering and economic havoc, and resulted in many unnecessary fatalities. The latest incident was a fire at a high-rise apartment in Urumqi, Xinjiang.
A COVID-19 lockdown prevented the residents from escaping the blaze and the firefighters from reaching them. Local officials say that 10 were killed, including three children, while nine were injured. Many believe the number of casualties is much higher.
Demonstrations erupted throughout China. Students at Beijing’s Tsinghua University held blank sheets of paper to show their disgust with government lies and censorship.
Song Dynasty poet Su Shih (蘇軾) wrote a poem to express that helpless feeling: “No words to ask; only tears in thousands of lines.”
The “Blank Paper Movement” appears to be the biggest nationwide protest in China under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in recent history.
The “zero COVID-19” policy has been intrusive, thoughtless, reckless and heartless. The majority of college students in China today have known nothing of college life, just COVID-19 lockdowns. Many low-income workers have been unable to feed their families, or care for their old and young. Youth unemployment has reached 20 percent. Worse yet, people have been deprived of freedom. Not surprisingly, protesters chanted: “Give me liberty or give me death.”
The curse for Chinese has been a totalitarian regime. Will this be the magical moment that finally breaks that curse?
Protesters have simple demands: democracy, freedom and for Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the CCP to step down. Clearly, public opinion is turning against the CCP as a legitimate government.
However, the movement is a spontaneous outpouring of emotions that does not have leaders.
Moreover, given that Xi is willing to jail or kill anyone who opposes him, one can expect few political concessions.
Regardless, when historians review these events, the movement might be recognized as the beginning of the end of the CCP, and a social movement of awakening for Chinese to seek liberty and justice, and to secure freedom and democracy, by revolution if necessary. How long it will take is anybody’s guess.
For the sake of humanity, the international community must ensure that Chinese get the help they need. Anyone who orders the shooting of protesters should be immediately prosecuted for crimes against humanity.
The Internet should be maintained to prevent the government from blocking and isolating the protests. Businesses, including Apple, should consider moving out of China as a form of economic sanction against the CCP’s tyrannical actions.
There is no recipe for a revolution to succeed, but nothing can be accomplished without good planning.
An opposition party should be organized to lead the negotiations. While the CCP’s 20th National Congress granted Xi another five-year term, the public has not. Xi should get five years as a transition period, while cities and provinces hold local elections in two years, and national elections in another two.
As American journalist Elmer Davis said: “This nation will remain the land of the free only so long as it is the home of the brave.” Bravery loves company. A lone figure with two banners on a highway overpass in central Beijing on Oct. 13 denounced Xi as a “despotic traitor.” Since then, tens of thousands have chanted the same.
While with “no words to ask; only tears to speak,” the movement in China has made history with its breadth and depth. Let history show that humanity will overpower tyranny.
James J.Y. Hsu is a retired professor of physics.
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS