India-Taiwan relations are at their strongest in history. The growing bonhomie between New Delhi and Taipei is a testimony to India’s increasing interests and stakes in Taiwan. Its keenness to engage Taiwan is noticeable.
Early last month, Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs Chen Chern-chyi (陳正祺) visited India, achieving several tangible outcomes. He was in India to participate in the annual deputy ministerial dialogue. He also addressed the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry’s India-Taiwan Industrial Collaboration Summit. His visit was well-received by the Indian government as well as by industry leaders.
“India can be the best production place for us. India’s policy of Make in India is fully in line with my government’s policy. Our companies will rely on horizontal collaborations [with Indian companies],” he said during his visit.
With the COVID-19 pandemic subsiding and Taiwan’s re-opening, economic and people-to-people exchanges between India and Taiwan have resumed.
In October, Indian lawmaker Sujeet Kumar visited Taiwan to participate in the high-level Yushan Forum and the inaugural Taiwan-India Dialogue hosted by the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation and Observer Research Foundation. His visit was the first by an Indian member of parliament to Taiwan in six years.
India-Taiwan relations are undergoing a significant transformation. India’s hardline approach toward, and further deterioration of, relations with China has led India to realize the futility of overlooking engagement with Taiwan, at least in the economic, tech and culture domains.
While India is growing more proactive in embracing the idea of engaging Taiwan, the scope is still narrowly defined. India’s eastward engagement would remain incomplete without truly including and working with Taiwan. There is a need for more openness and transparency from the Indian side.
Engagement with Taiwan is not about China, but about mutual benefit. Taiwan is a key part of India’s ambitions of establishing itself as an alternative supply chain hub, and its investment in India could be a game changer for the flagship initiatives of Indian Prime Minster Narendra Modi’s administration, such as production-linked incentives, “digital India,” “Make in India,” and modified programs for semiconductors and the display fab ecosystem.
Defending Taiwan is critical to ensuring a rules-based liberal order in the Indo-Pacific region. Taiwan is an antithesis to China’s authoritarian model of governance. Taiwanese democracy is applauded in the Indo-Pacific region for its openness and transparency. A free Taiwan is exposing the looming fault lines in China. This makes protecting Taiwan from a potential Chinese invasion more important for key stakeholders in the region.
Despite what Beijing claims, Taiwan is no longer just a sovereignty issue for China, but an important piece in achieving a geopolitical victory in the China-US great power rivalry and defying the Indo-Pacific rules-based order. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), China not only seems insecure, but is also becoming more determined to intimidate Taiwan militarily. This pattern in Chinese territorial behavior is a cause for concern for India and some other fellow democracies.
China’s overtures in the Solomon Islands and wider South Pacific have triggered alarms in neighboring Australia and New Zealand as well. Bereft of any institutional mechanism to deal with China’s hegemonic tactics, countries are realizing the importance of safeguarding a rules-based order.
Rising powers such as India and Japan, and middle powers such as Australia, are increasingly playing a bigger role and acting as responsible stakeholders.
India should be a part of the collective effort to maintain the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan’s participation in the Indo-Pacific region would benefit all stakeholders in the region, economically and strategically. It is vital to accept and acknowledge that Taiwan is not part of the problem, rather a part of the solution. It is China that has used military and economic coercion to change the “status quo.”
India is no stranger to such a tactic by China. Similar behavior meted out to India by China should make it more compelling for India to speak out for Taiwan. Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) rightly pointed out that China’s geostrategic ambitions would not stop with Taiwan, and would go beyond.
There is hardly any doubt that the next target for China’s aggression will be India.
Sana Hashmi is postdoctoral fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation.
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
RSS