In the lead-up to the 2020 US presidential election, more Taiwanese were rooting for then-US president Donald Trump than his eventual successor, Joe Biden, a YouGov poll showed at the time. If Trump is declared the Republican nominee for president in 2024, they might want to think twice about backing him again.
Taiwanese support for Trump derived from a belief that he was “on their side,” a view ostensibly backed by the US’ pro-Taiwan policies during his term, including an increase in US arms sales to Taipei and high-profile visits to the nation by senior Trump administration officials.
However, Trump’s support for Taiwan was not altruistic. Rather, it was driven by a desire to gain leverage over Beijing on issues such as trade and North Korea.
The risk for Taiwan if Trump wins the Republican nomination and retakes the White House in two years is that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) might see an opportunity to forcefully take the nation, based on the belief that Trump would do nothing to stop him, including refraining from imposing crippling sanctions of the kind the US and Europe have levied against Moscow after Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the invasion of Ukraine.
Insight into what Trump really thinks about Taiwan has come from several books, including journalist Josh Rogin’s Chaos Under Heaven: Trump, Xi, and the Battle for the Twenty-First Century, which quotes Trump as telling a shocked Republican US senator that as Taiwan was so close to China and almost 13,000km from the US, should an invasion occur “there isn’t a f***ing thing we can do about it.”
Trump-appointed former US national security adviser John Bolton wrote in his memoir that Trump considered Taiwan to be relatively insignificant, once comparing it to the tip of a Sharpie felt-tip pen.
The first three years of the Trump administration were focused on negotiating a trade pact with China that would deliver a big “win” for the US — and be Trump’s ticket to re-election in 2020. During that time, Trump was open to giving favors to Xi, often at the expense of Taiwan, Rogin wrote.
Efforts to restart negotiations on a free-trade pact with Taiwan also stalled under Trump-appointed former US trade representative Robert Lighthizer, who was concerned about upsetting Beijing and undermining two years of negotiations on the China trade deal.
The friendship between Trump and Xi came to an abrupt end after COVID-19 spread from China to the rest of the world.
Trump’s botched response to the ensuing pandemic — which he vociferously blamed on China — contributed to his losing the 2020 election to Biden. Ever since, there has been a lot of speculation over Xi’s timetable for taking Taiwan — by force if necessary — with estimates ranging from five to 10 years. One school of thought says Xi might have a “now or never” window to take Taiwan given that he has secured a norm-breaking third term and might need a distraction from a raft of problems ranging from demographic decline to a slowing economy.
Biden has, on multiple occasions since being elected, said the US military would support Taiwan in a conflict with China. While some analysts said these statements were mistakes by the gaffe-prone Biden, given the official US stance of strategic ambiguity on Taiwan, they were just as likely deliberate attempts to send a message to Xi to dissuade him from using force.
While Xi might think twice about moving against Taiwan while Biden is in charge, that calculation might change if Trump were to be back in the Oval Office. Known for opposing foreign military adventures, Trump has questioned his own defense chiefs about the benefit of having US troops stationed in allies such as South Korea, and even asked them “what do we get” from protecting Taiwan in a meeting in January 2018, journalist Bob Woodward wrote in his book Fear: Trump in the White House.
The “silicon shield” theory states that the US would be forced to come to Taiwan’s aid in a cross-strait conflict to protect the supply chain for semiconductors, which are critical for powering the high-tech economy.
Trump might not agree with the theory, but he does seem to understand the impact that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would have on the global semiconductor supply chain. In a telephone call with professional golfer John Daly in March, Trump said: “You won’t have any computer chips” because China would “blow them off the face of the Earth.”
Craig Addison is a journalist and documentary filmmaker. His Silicon Shield documentary is available on Vimeo on Demand.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS