In the UK and nations of the Commonwealth, Nov. 11 every year is observed as Remembrance Day. On this day every year, the British government organizes solemn ceremonies to commemorate those who died for their kingdom since World War I. People mark the day by wearing a red poppy, strolling to a nearby war memorial to mourn and pay tribute to fallen soldiers.
Young British people sacrificed their lives in two world wars, but the page of history has turned. In Europe, peace has reigned. Nevertheless, we commemorate the past so as not to forget the sacrifices and contributions of our predecessors, and to never forget that one cannot put a price on peace.
Later generations must put their hearts and souls into defending national security and sovereignty, just like their predecessors.
A friend of mine has been advocating for the Kuma Academy and demanding that all candidates in next week’s local elections sign a pledge to “defend Taiwan and never surrender.”
Two months ago, I asked him: “A war will surely lead to sacrifice and death, so what would you do to make our people believe that their effort would be worthwhile and their passing meaningful?”
My friend did not give me an answer, but history always teaches us a lesson.
In North America, George Washington was able to lead the 13 states in the American War of Independence precisely because the representatives of those 13 states had already signed the Declaration of Independence in Philadelphia. It was only natural for them to fight for their country.
Eighty years later in the Civil War, Americans were willing to make great sacrifices again. Their purpose was to defend their country in accordance with the constitution, which affirms the rights and equality of people.
What would Taiwanese sacrifice their lives for?
Should our people be asked to sacrifice themselves for our country, a much stronger consensus is needed, and the consensus can only be founded upon a constitution. Therefore, we must establish a new constitution in which Taiwan is the main subject, and Taiwanese would be stakeholders in this constitution, and be given to defend it.
Without this new constitution, how could the sacrifice of our people be considered as a deed for a greater cause, as a glorious act that involves both the living and the dead?
A populace without its own constitution is like a people without a nation. Even if some are willing to sacrifice for their country, they would not be commemorated by the later generations.
Nov. 11 should not be a crass shopping festival. Rather, we should ponder the following question: “When the British people solemnly commemorate their fallen soldiers, how do we remember our predecessors who had sacrificed themselves to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy, freedom, sovereignty and independence?”
A people should understand the meaning of a national remembrance, or they would not be able to protect their own country.
Yao Meng-chang is an assistant professor in Fujen Catholic University’s Department of Postgraduate Legal Studies.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
No state has ever formally recognized the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) as a legal entity. The reason is not a lack of legitimacy — the CTA is a functioning exile government with democratic elections and institutions — but the iron grip of realpolitik. To recognize the CTA would be to challenge the People’s Republic of China’s territorial claims, a step no government has been willing to take given Beijing’s economic leverage and geopolitical weight. Under international law, recognition of governments-in-exile has precedent — from the Polish government during World War II to Kuwait’s exile government in 1990 — but such recognition
RSS