In the UK and nations of the Commonwealth, Nov. 11 every year is observed as Remembrance Day. On this day every year, the British government organizes solemn ceremonies to commemorate those who died for their kingdom since World War I. People mark the day by wearing a red poppy, strolling to a nearby war memorial to mourn and pay tribute to fallen soldiers.
Young British people sacrificed their lives in two world wars, but the page of history has turned. In Europe, peace has reigned. Nevertheless, we commemorate the past so as not to forget the sacrifices and contributions of our predecessors, and to never forget that one cannot put a price on peace.
Later generations must put their hearts and souls into defending national security and sovereignty, just like their predecessors.
A friend of mine has been advocating for the Kuma Academy and demanding that all candidates in next week’s local elections sign a pledge to “defend Taiwan and never surrender.”
Two months ago, I asked him: “A war will surely lead to sacrifice and death, so what would you do to make our people believe that their effort would be worthwhile and their passing meaningful?”
My friend did not give me an answer, but history always teaches us a lesson.
In North America, George Washington was able to lead the 13 states in the American War of Independence precisely because the representatives of those 13 states had already signed the Declaration of Independence in Philadelphia. It was only natural for them to fight for their country.
Eighty years later in the Civil War, Americans were willing to make great sacrifices again. Their purpose was to defend their country in accordance with the constitution, which affirms the rights and equality of people.
What would Taiwanese sacrifice their lives for?
Should our people be asked to sacrifice themselves for our country, a much stronger consensus is needed, and the consensus can only be founded upon a constitution. Therefore, we must establish a new constitution in which Taiwan is the main subject, and Taiwanese would be stakeholders in this constitution, and be given to defend it.
Without this new constitution, how could the sacrifice of our people be considered as a deed for a greater cause, as a glorious act that involves both the living and the dead?
A populace without its own constitution is like a people without a nation. Even if some are willing to sacrifice for their country, they would not be commemorated by the later generations.
Nov. 11 should not be a crass shopping festival. Rather, we should ponder the following question: “When the British people solemnly commemorate their fallen soldiers, how do we remember our predecessors who had sacrificed themselves to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy, freedom, sovereignty and independence?”
A people should understand the meaning of a national remembrance, or they would not be able to protect their own country.
Yao Meng-chang is an assistant professor in Fujen Catholic University’s Department of Postgraduate Legal Studies.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Ahead of US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) meeting today on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea, an op-ed published in Time magazine last week maliciously called President William Lai (賴清德) a “reckless leader,” stirring skepticism in Taiwan about the US and fueling unease over the Trump-Xi talks. In line with his frequent criticism of the democratically elected ruling Democratic Progressive Party — which has stood up to China’s hostile military maneuvers and rejected Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework — Lyle Goldstein, Asia engagement director at the US think tank Defense Priorities, called
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS