In the UK and nations of the Commonwealth, Nov. 11 every year is observed as Remembrance Day. On this day every year, the British government organizes solemn ceremonies to commemorate those who died for their kingdom since World War I. People mark the day by wearing a red poppy, strolling to a nearby war memorial to mourn and pay tribute to fallen soldiers.
Young British people sacrificed their lives in two world wars, but the page of history has turned. In Europe, peace has reigned. Nevertheless, we commemorate the past so as not to forget the sacrifices and contributions of our predecessors, and to never forget that one cannot put a price on peace.
Later generations must put their hearts and souls into defending national security and sovereignty, just like their predecessors.
A friend of mine has been advocating for the Kuma Academy and demanding that all candidates in next week’s local elections sign a pledge to “defend Taiwan and never surrender.”
Two months ago, I asked him: “A war will surely lead to sacrifice and death, so what would you do to make our people believe that their effort would be worthwhile and their passing meaningful?”
My friend did not give me an answer, but history always teaches us a lesson.
In North America, George Washington was able to lead the 13 states in the American War of Independence precisely because the representatives of those 13 states had already signed the Declaration of Independence in Philadelphia. It was only natural for them to fight for their country.
Eighty years later in the Civil War, Americans were willing to make great sacrifices again. Their purpose was to defend their country in accordance with the constitution, which affirms the rights and equality of people.
What would Taiwanese sacrifice their lives for?
Should our people be asked to sacrifice themselves for our country, a much stronger consensus is needed, and the consensus can only be founded upon a constitution. Therefore, we must establish a new constitution in which Taiwan is the main subject, and Taiwanese would be stakeholders in this constitution, and be given to defend it.
Without this new constitution, how could the sacrifice of our people be considered as a deed for a greater cause, as a glorious act that involves both the living and the dead?
A populace without its own constitution is like a people without a nation. Even if some are willing to sacrifice for their country, they would not be commemorated by the later generations.
Nov. 11 should not be a crass shopping festival. Rather, we should ponder the following question: “When the British people solemnly commemorate their fallen soldiers, how do we remember our predecessors who had sacrificed themselves to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy, freedom, sovereignty and independence?”
A people should understand the meaning of a national remembrance, or they would not be able to protect their own country.
Yao Meng-chang is an assistant professor in Fujen Catholic University’s Department of Postgraduate Legal Studies.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS