A private corporation or institution has the right to grant employees special paid leave to study for a doctoral degree. People might look on in envy, but they have no say in the matter.
However, people are entitled to say a thing or two if the same scenario takes place at a government institution, as it concerns taxpayers’ money.
Legislator Ann Kao (高虹安), the Taiwan People’s Party’s (TPP) candidate for Hsinchu mayor, has been trying to justify her “privilege” and explain why she was given special paid leave at the Institute for Information Industry, which allowed her to spend 574 days on “business trips” within six years to obtain a doctoral degree at the University of Cincinnati.
Her initial defense was that the institute was a private entity. Little did she know that the institute’s president is required to attend interpellation sessions at the legislature when needed. This is enough to show that the institute is not a purely private entity. Despite being a legislator, it seems that Kao has little idea of a legislator’s duties.
It should be investigated why Kao had the privilege of being granted special paid leave to study for a doctorate in the US.
Was it because her supervisors and superiors at the institute were in the dark about her actions, or did they make an exception for her and help cover up her actions?
Former institute president Wu Ruey-beei (吳瑞北) showed his support for Kao. Using Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) as an example, Wu said that Chang in 1988 also moonlighted as TSMC chairman while serving as chairman of the Industrial Technology Research Institute.
Without Chang holding the two positions, there would be no TSMC, Wu said.
Despite speaking up for Kao, Wu evaded questions on whether it is illegal to take special paid leave at the institute to study for a doctoral degree.
Coincidentally, Wu in 2017 published a book that contained an introduction written by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taoyuan mayoral candidate Simon Chang (張善政), who is accused of plagiarizing papers from a NT$57 million (US$1.77 million) research project he undertook for the Council of Agriculture from 2007 to 2009.
It would seem that Wu, Simon Chang and Kao are in a secret circle at the institute.
Further, Kao seems to have connections to Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, whose vice chairman, Jay Lee (李傑), was her doctoral dissertation adviser.
Within his first year at the company, and before being promoted to his current position in July 2019, Lee pulled the strings for Kao to have a job interview with Hon Hai founder Terry Gou (郭台銘).
On April 21, 2018, when Kao was still employed at the institute, she signed an employment contract with Hon Hai. On April 27 that year, Kao’s dissertation was approved. On May 15, she resigned from the institute, and a day later started her new job as director of Hon Hai’s big data center.
Putting in a good word for her, Gou in 2020 had the TPP put her on the list of legislator-at-large nominees. It is apparent that Gou, Lee and Kao are all members of the Hon Hai cult.
It is ironic that Taipei Mayor and TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who rose to power because of his anti-elitist image, would now treat Kao, an elitist flaunting privileges at the institute and Hon Hai, as his right-hand woman.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education.
Translated by Rita Wang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS