A private corporation or institution has the right to grant employees special paid leave to study for a doctoral degree. People might look on in envy, but they have no say in the matter.
However, people are entitled to say a thing or two if the same scenario takes place at a government institution, as it concerns taxpayers’ money.
Legislator Ann Kao (高虹安), the Taiwan People’s Party’s (TPP) candidate for Hsinchu mayor, has been trying to justify her “privilege” and explain why she was given special paid leave at the Institute for Information Industry, which allowed her to spend 574 days on “business trips” within six years to obtain a doctoral degree at the University of Cincinnati.
Her initial defense was that the institute was a private entity. Little did she know that the institute’s president is required to attend interpellation sessions at the legislature when needed. This is enough to show that the institute is not a purely private entity. Despite being a legislator, it seems that Kao has little idea of a legislator’s duties.
It should be investigated why Kao had the privilege of being granted special paid leave to study for a doctorate in the US.
Was it because her supervisors and superiors at the institute were in the dark about her actions, or did they make an exception for her and help cover up her actions?
Former institute president Wu Ruey-beei (吳瑞北) showed his support for Kao. Using Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) as an example, Wu said that Chang in 1988 also moonlighted as TSMC chairman while serving as chairman of the Industrial Technology Research Institute.
Without Chang holding the two positions, there would be no TSMC, Wu said.
Despite speaking up for Kao, Wu evaded questions on whether it is illegal to take special paid leave at the institute to study for a doctoral degree.
Coincidentally, Wu in 2017 published a book that contained an introduction written by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taoyuan mayoral candidate Simon Chang (張善政), who is accused of plagiarizing papers from a NT$57 million (US$1.77 million) research project he undertook for the Council of Agriculture from 2007 to 2009.
It would seem that Wu, Simon Chang and Kao are in a secret circle at the institute.
Further, Kao seems to have connections to Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, whose vice chairman, Jay Lee (李傑), was her doctoral dissertation adviser.
Within his first year at the company, and before being promoted to his current position in July 2019, Lee pulled the strings for Kao to have a job interview with Hon Hai founder Terry Gou (郭台銘).
On April 21, 2018, when Kao was still employed at the institute, she signed an employment contract with Hon Hai. On April 27 that year, Kao’s dissertation was approved. On May 15, she resigned from the institute, and a day later started her new job as director of Hon Hai’s big data center.
Putting in a good word for her, Gou in 2020 had the TPP put her on the list of legislator-at-large nominees. It is apparent that Gou, Lee and Kao are all members of the Hon Hai cult.
It is ironic that Taipei Mayor and TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who rose to power because of his anti-elitist image, would now treat Kao, an elitist flaunting privileges at the institute and Hon Hai, as his right-hand woman.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education.
Translated by Rita Wang
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS