Starting from November, and in line with recent amendments to the Compulsory Automobile Liability Insurance Act (強制汽車責任保險法), electric bicycles (e-bikes) and other small electric two-wheeled vehicles must be licensed with mounted license plates before they can be ridden on the road.
This change should resolve some existing problems, such as the difficulty that e-bike owners have faced in receiving help to find their bikes if they are stolen, and the difficulty that road users have in holding anyone accountable when an accident occurs. It would also allow the more than 600,000 e-bikes that are currently being ridden on Taiwan’s roads to escape from their uncertain legal status and find their own niche in the system.
However, making e-bikes carry license plates is only the first step in solving a host of problems. Authorities still have their work cut out to ensure that e-bikes can be safely ridden on the roads, while also protecting the safety of all road users.
The “safety type approval management regulations for electrically power-assisted cycles and electric bicycles” (電動輔助自行車及電動自行車型式安全審驗管理辦法) stipulate that on its way from the factory to the road, an e-bike has to go through inspection, examination, reinspection, checking, random inspection and receiving a conformity certification sticker, plus the new procedure of licensing and issuance of a license plate, which involves a further check as to whether the previous procedure had been followed. As such, there should be no worries about the safety of e-bikes that are newly licensed from November onward.
However, what about the more than 600,000 e-bikes that are already on the road? Very few e-bikes on the market were made in Taiwan from start to finish — just as not many compressors used in Taiwan are made in Japan. The vast majority of e-bikes are assembled in Taiwan using components imported from China. Unscrupulous manufacturers have ways of getting around the complicated and intricate safety inspection and management procedures.
After assembling their products, they can either forge the conformity seal with its “lightning bolt” logo and the accompanying license plate, or buy fake ones online and then proceed to put their e-bikes on the market. What started out as an open secret in the e-bike business has since been exposed by amateur sleuths posting on the Internet.
Following a joint investigation by local governments, this matter has become an important issue that authorities must confront.
This issue is a test for the authorities as to how they should implement the consistency of production of e-bikes on the market, and highlights the importance of vehicle safety type approval. How can the authorities ensure the safety of e-bikes that have not gone through the legally required procedure? How can they implement a supplementary inspection and test program for e-bikes that are already on the road? Would it be legal to certify existing bikes on the spot, or should they all be recalled and retested before being licensed?
All of these questions should put the wisdom of transport authorities to the test. Furthermore, the new system is scheduled to be launched in less than two months, but the procedures have not been determined. This situation reveals the lax management of transport authorities and a serious lack of respect for the new system.
Wang Kuan-hsiang is secretary-general of the Taiwan Vehicle Industry Association.
Translated by Julian Clegg
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS