Starting from November, and in line with recent amendments to the Compulsory Automobile Liability Insurance Act (強制汽車責任保險法), electric bicycles (e-bikes) and other small electric two-wheeled vehicles must be licensed with mounted license plates before they can be ridden on the road.
This change should resolve some existing problems, such as the difficulty that e-bike owners have faced in receiving help to find their bikes if they are stolen, and the difficulty that road users have in holding anyone accountable when an accident occurs. It would also allow the more than 600,000 e-bikes that are currently being ridden on Taiwan’s roads to escape from their uncertain legal status and find their own niche in the system.
However, making e-bikes carry license plates is only the first step in solving a host of problems. Authorities still have their work cut out to ensure that e-bikes can be safely ridden on the roads, while also protecting the safety of all road users.
The “safety type approval management regulations for electrically power-assisted cycles and electric bicycles” (電動輔助自行車及電動自行車型式安全審驗管理辦法) stipulate that on its way from the factory to the road, an e-bike has to go through inspection, examination, reinspection, checking, random inspection and receiving a conformity certification sticker, plus the new procedure of licensing and issuance of a license plate, which involves a further check as to whether the previous procedure had been followed. As such, there should be no worries about the safety of e-bikes that are newly licensed from November onward.
However, what about the more than 600,000 e-bikes that are already on the road? Very few e-bikes on the market were made in Taiwan from start to finish — just as not many compressors used in Taiwan are made in Japan. The vast majority of e-bikes are assembled in Taiwan using components imported from China. Unscrupulous manufacturers have ways of getting around the complicated and intricate safety inspection and management procedures.
After assembling their products, they can either forge the conformity seal with its “lightning bolt” logo and the accompanying license plate, or buy fake ones online and then proceed to put their e-bikes on the market. What started out as an open secret in the e-bike business has since been exposed by amateur sleuths posting on the Internet.
Following a joint investigation by local governments, this matter has become an important issue that authorities must confront.
This issue is a test for the authorities as to how they should implement the consistency of production of e-bikes on the market, and highlights the importance of vehicle safety type approval. How can the authorities ensure the safety of e-bikes that have not gone through the legally required procedure? How can they implement a supplementary inspection and test program for e-bikes that are already on the road? Would it be legal to certify existing bikes on the spot, or should they all be recalled and retested before being licensed?
All of these questions should put the wisdom of transport authorities to the test. Furthermore, the new system is scheduled to be launched in less than two months, but the procedures have not been determined. This situation reveals the lax management of transport authorities and a serious lack of respect for the new system.
Wang Kuan-hsiang is secretary-general of the Taiwan Vehicle Industry Association.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS