US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan last week represented a milestone in Taiwan-US relations, but also pricked the bubble of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) big lie that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China.
During a speech delivered at the Presidential Office in Taipei on Wednesday, Pelosi said: “Forty-two years ago, America made a bedrock promise to always stand with Taiwan,” referring to the US’ Taiwan Relations Act of 1979.
On the eve of her visit to Taiwan, Pelosi published an article in the Washington Post in which she stated that “America must stand by Taiwan.”
With China closing in on Taiwan militarily, economically and diplomatically, Pelosi’s visit was an affirmation of the US’ pledge to defend Taiwan, a fellow democracy and one that Freedom House rates as one of the freest in the world — but whose freedom is now under severe threat.
During these perilous times, Pelosi’s visit has given Taiwanese a much-needed morale boost.
Following her visit, China’s People’s Liberation Army began joint air and sea drills, encircling Taiwan proper to simulate a blockade or “quarantine” of Taiwan.
In addition to military coercion, the CCP uses ethnonationalism to whip its populace into a lather of hatred and loathing, and regularly issues blood-curdling threats of violence to intimidate Taiwanese.
This is the behavior of a hoodlum.
History is repeating itself in the 21st century as Chinese-style ultranationalism is on the rise. As former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo said during a historic speech at the Nixon Library in 2020, China is this century’s “evil empire.”
China as an evil empire is nothing new: The history of imperial China, stretching back several thousands of years, could be said to be that of an “evil empire.”
Over the centuries, China’s borders have gradually pushed outward, north, south, east and west, as it conquered and annexed the “lands of foreign barbarians” on its periphery to become a sprawling empire.
The CCP has inherited political and cultural Confucianism, which holds the absurd notion that: “All land under heaven belongs to the emperor, and all people are the emperor’s servants” (普天之下,莫非王土,率土之濱,莫非王臣).
This ancient Chinese culture of invasion and conquest has been elevated to new heights of perfection by the CCP.
Since 1979, Beijing has used its “one China” principle to create the lie of the century.
The CCP continually says that it is resolutely determined to “smash” what it calls “Taiwanese independence separatists” and “interfering foreign forces,” to “unite the motherland” and realize the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese people.”
However, for all Beijing’s hue and cry, world opinion has coalesced around a consensus to resist Chinese expansionism and protect Taiwan. Furthermore, there is a paradox at play: Like the “band-tightening spell” in Journey to the West (西遊記), the more powerful China becomes to achieve its goal of annexing Taiwan, the faster the CCP hastens its own demise.
During her address at the Presidential Office, Pelosi said: “America’s determination to preserve democracy, here in Taiwan and around the world, remains ironclad.”
Her visit has broken the CCP’s spell that “Taiwan is part of China.”
Taiwan is a fortress against communist China and an “unsinkable aircraft carrier” in the west Pacific.
Chen Ching-kuen is a university assistant professor.
Translated by Edward Jones
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several