The visit by US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan on Wednesday should be seen as a watershed development in the relationship between Taiwan and the US. The visit assumed significance not only because Pelosi’s presence in Taipei burst the bubble of Chinese military hype regarding Taiwan and the US, but also because it renewed the US’ commitment to helping Taiwan protect its independent national identity.
It was in this context that speaking at an event alongside President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), Pelosi said: “Now, more than ever, America’s solidarity with Taiwan is crucial, that’s the message we bring in today.”
This was not the first visit by a US House speaker and what Pelosi said is a well-established position on Taiwan of the US administration. The question that has remained unexamined is why China was so critical of her visit.
The reason is that Beijing is disturbed that under Tsai’s leadership since 2016, the relationship between Taiwan and the US has improved by a great degree in all dimensions, with a special focus on security and defense ties, highlighted by the US including Taiwan in its Indo-Pacific strategy.
Thus, while Taiwan has improved ties with other regional powers, including India, Japan and Australia, Taipei and Washington also signed an agreement identical to the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. This sent a clear message to China that US President Joe Biden’s statement that the US would militarily protect Taiwan if China were to attack was not an off-the-cuff remark. China is also aware of Taiwan’s increasing popularity among Americans and elsewhere. Taiwan’s cooperation with the rest of the world during the COVID-19 pandemic has made other countries realize the nation’s value as a liberal democracy.
Concerned about Taiwan’s increasing popularity, China saw an opportunity in the failure of US-led NATO to prevent Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to intensify pressure on Taiwan. Over the past four months, there has been a significant rise in the sorties by Chinese warplanes toward Taiwan’s air space.
However, Taiwan has not bitten, calmly responding to Beijing’s provocations.
Meanwhile, global opinion has increased against China’s intimidation tactics.
If Taiwan’s unperturbed response the assertive posturing was not enough to frustrate China, the announcement of Pelosi’s visit was enough to infuriated it. China wanted to reassert its claim over Taiwan by preventing Pelosi’s visit. Using its economic and military might, China attempted to intimidate the US by saying that Washington would “pay a price” for its “mistakes.”
However, it failed to assess the US’ resolve to support Taiwan. The bipartisan support for Pelosi’s visit has underscored the US’ strong support for the self-identity of Taiwanese.
Moreover, the visit exposed China’s limitations in its assertive posturing.
Pelosi’s strong criticism of China for its human rights violations and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) effort to remove challenges to his third term are other reasons for China’s anger.
At the same time, given that Taiwan’s relations with the rest of the world have improved significantly, there is increasing fear in Beijing that other countries will send delegations of elected representatives, giving Taiwan more legitimacy for its nationhood.
An elected member of the Indian parliament has already asked the speaker of the Lower House of the Indian parliament to lead a similar delegation to Taiwan.
Such a proposal was previously unthinkable as far as India-Taiwan relations were concerned. Pelosi’s visit will play a major role in repositioning the US in the region. This is because the war in Ukraine and the US’ withdrawal from Afghanistan created an impression that Washington was neither in a position nor interested in leading the world. Consequently, a section of international relations experts had begun to argue about the uncertain future of Taiwan.
However, Pelosi’s arrival completely changed the worldview of the US’ stand on Taiwan. Her presence in Taipei underscored the US’ clear vision in its policy of “strategic ambiguity.”
The successful visit does not mean that China will remain silent. Taiwan and the US must have anticipated the possible actions from the Chinese side, so its symbolic military drills and other activities directed at Taiwan should not be seen as a major development unless the Chinese reaction is elevated to another level.
While Pelosi’s visit has established Taiwan as an independent country for all practical purposes, it remains to be seen how much further China will go to express its displeasure.
Sumit Kumar is a former Ministry of Foreign Affairs visiting fellow at National Chengchi University.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS