The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Confucius Institutes — which former US president Donald Trump vowed to eliminate during his administration — have been trying to make a comeback ever since US President Joe Biden took office, a report published by the US National Association of Scholars said.
In its heyday, the CCP had 118 Confucius Institutes in universities across the US, but today only 14 of them remain. To crack down on Confucius Institutes, which are used by the CCP for ulterior motives, the Trump administration took a number of steps.
First, the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act stipulated that universities that host Confucius Institutes on their campuses would not receive language program subsidies from the US Department of Defense.
Second, the Trump administration categorized Confucius Institutes as “foreign missions” under the provisions of the Foreign Missions Act, restricting the entry and exit of their personnel and the free flow of funds.
Finally, Trump issued an executive order that required US universities to disclose the foreign funds they receive, or their federal subsidies would be suspended.
Although in some aspects, such as the Indo-Pacific strategy, US-China competition remains, but in the field of culture and education, Biden appears to be disinclined to impose restrictions.
This can be seen, first, in the rescinding of the order that US universities must disclose their financial sources, and second, the Department of Defense no longer requiring universities to choose between language program subsidies and Confucius Institutes.
Meanwhile, the CCP adjusted and restructured the Chinese Ministry of Education’s “Hanban” (漢辦, Office of Chinese Language Council International, also known as Confucius Institute Headquarters) under the new name Center for Language Education and Cooperation (中外語言交流合作中心) in July 2020. Beijing also established the Chinese International Education Foundation (中國國際中文教育基金會) under the guise of a private charitable organization, to supervise the Confucius Institutes.
The CCP is, on the one hand, trying to maintain the remaining Confucius Institutes as much as possible, while on the other, adopting flexible approaches to bring back those that have already been closed.
The most common means of achieving this is to change the name Confucius Institute into a name such as “China Research Center,” essentially retaining the original office premises and staff.
If the host US university does not accept this model, the Confucius Institute is transferred to the university as a directly affiliated institution, decoupling funds and personnel from the Chinese side — only the teachers and the provisions of the curriculum remain.
The final solution is to find a new owner — another education institution — to house the abolished Confucius Institute.
Judging by these organizational and practical adjustments, it can be seen that having weathered the Trump administration’s crackdown on Confucius Institutes, China has become shrewder in policy rebranding and shown flexibility.
For example, government organizations have been disguised as non-governmental organizations to survive. Of these, some closed Confucius Institutes have been relocated to high schools or community education institutions, proving they are willing to sacrifice nearly anything to survive.
According to Beijing’s plan, Confucius Institutes should be set up in universities, and Confucius Institute Classrooms should be set up in high schools. Settling themselves up in high schools is tantamount to a downgrading of their status, but under the present difficult circumstances, they have to swallow their pride to survive.
If Taiwan can seize the opportunity while the Confucius Institutes are undergoing transformation and seize the market for overseas Chinese teaching, it would help enhance Taiwan’s soft power and visibility within the international community, and could even enable Taiwan to compete with China’s Confucius Institutes.
Yang Chung-hsin is a civil servant.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS