The output of Taiwan’s information and electronics industry was about US$188.6 billion last year, with the software industry only accounting for US$11.4 billion, or less than 6 percent. This ratio has not changed much over the past 10 years, and it is consistent with Taiwan’s image as a “hardware giant,” but a “software dwarf.”
Various theories have attempted to explain the persisitent sluggishness of Taiwan’s software industry, one of the more convincing positing that the industry was never able to emulate the winning strategy of the hardware industry, which is designing and manufacturing globally competitive products.
Although the software industry has an outsourcing business model similar to the hardware industry’s original design manufacturing (ODM) and original equipment manufacturing (OEM) models, its associated revenue model tends to be project-based.
In contrast, the revenue model for hardware ODM/OEM is product-based. Compared with project-based production, product-based production is more profitable, shows greater scalability and provides more momentum for company growth.
Not being able to create products that can be exported internationally, Taiwan’s software industry has no choice but to focus on shorter-term projects from the domestic public and private sectors. As the nation’s government agencies and private companies habitually undervalue software products and services, local software firms often struggle financially and are rarely seen as role models for young people.
Taiwanese universities’ best software engineering graduates favor the semiconductor industry, the information and communication systems industry, and international employers.
So, how can Taiwanese software companies escape this situation and grow to develop and market globally competitive commercial software products?
Aggressively embracing open-source software might be a promising strategy. Open-source programs are developed through collaborative efforts by programmers belonging to different organizations, and its source code can be downloaded and sometimes even commercialized for free.
However, an open-source program’s quality and its follow-up services are often inferior to commercial software. Many decisionmakers in government agencies and private firms are therefore skeptical about the value of open-source software and shy away from the concept.
In reality, open-source software has come a long way in the past 10 years.
Through extensive use, repeated hardening and communal enhancements, the quality, performance and stability of widely used open-source programs, such as Linux, Android, MySQL, Chrome, etc, exceed their commercial counterparts.
Second, allowing users to download and try software for free is regarded as a highly effective marketing tool for customer acquisition and feedback collection. People often feel more comfortable with software using a publicly available source code, because doing so lowers security and lock-in risks.
Finally, the “freemium” business model, which makes the basic version of a product available for free, while advanced versions and follow-up support services require payment, has enabled many open-source software companies to become profitable and even go public.
In light of the increasing appeal of open-source software, some start-ups make the source codes of their products available so as to win over market and user acceptance.
Even well-established commercial software companies have pursued similar strategies. For example, Microsoft has open-sourced such major software products as Windows Core OS, SONiC and the .NET Framework.
The extent to which one engages in the use and development of open-source software can be classified into four tiers:
Tier 1: Importing a specific open-source program for product development or personal use, including reporting software bugs and usage experiences that need improvement.
Tier 2: Developing deployment and management tools for open-source software, and providing consulting, configuration and optimization services.
Tier 3: Acquiring an in-depth understanding of the system architecture, core algorithms and program logic of a specific open-source program, to be able to fix bugs and add new features.
Tier 4: Initiating a new open-source project, and mustering a team to form a community and join its development.
The involvement of most local firms, universities and agencies in open-source software remains largely at tier 1: They use open-source software, but do not contribute to its further development.
People at tier 2 could potentially create professional support companies that help customers simplify their use of open-source software.
Those at tier 3 could start a company that optimizes, customizes and adds new functions to open-source software.
Those at tier 4 can become an open-source software’s authoritative developer and establish a company that monetizes it using a freemium model.
By engaging heavily in the development of open-source software of reasonable complexity, local firms could substantively strengthen their research-and-development capabilities.
Moreover, through intense participation in the operation of an open-source software ecosystem, such software companies would be able to pick up concrete skills, including how to position, develop, market, sell and support software products already blessed with significant commercial value.
Finally, close interactions with other parties in the same open-source software community would enable companies to establish business connections required to target international markets, and cultivate long-lasting alliances and partnerships along the way.
Chiueh Tzi-cker is a joint appointment professor in the Institute of Information Security at National Tsing Hua University.
The Comedy Club on Fuxing N Road in Taipei was vandalized with paint bombs mixed with feces on May 29, allegedly because one of its performers had satirized Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The incident has triggered concerns about the growing threat from China’s cross-border repression within Taiwan. On the day of the attack, a comedian surnamed Huang (黃), who is known for mocking Xi, was the headline performer. The Comedy Club founder said the assault was obviously politically motivated. China, which Freedom House said “conducts the most sophisticated, extensive and far-reaching campaign of transnational repression in the world,” has
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) at a press conference last week repeated the same, tired line, claiming that Taiwan’s future should be “decided jointly by the more than 1.4 billion Chinese people, including Taiwan compatriots.” The statement is absurd. Virtually every word is incorrect, with some parts mistaken to an astonishing degree. First, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never included Taiwan. When the Republic of China’s (ROC) original five-colored flag was established in 1912, Taiwan was still under Japanese rule. When the PRC was founded in 1949, Taiwan was under the control of president Chiang
As semiconductor manufacturing crosses the 2-nanometer threshold into the era of the angstrom, the global chip race is now about much more than shrinking dimensions. It has become a broader system of competition encompassing transistor architecture, backside power delivery, advanced packaging, manufacturing data, artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and national-level strategies. What makes Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC 台積電) truly exceptional is not just its ability to manufacture chips, but its capacity to integrate unique client demands, process controls, equipment coordination, packaging technologies and high production yields into a system of manufacturing governance that is arguably the world’s most difficult to
Just before dawn on Jan. 17, a Chinese military drone crossed for the first time into Taiwanese airspace above a disputed coral reef in the South China Sea. The reconnaissance aircraft lingered over Pratas Island (Xisha Island, 西沙群島) for a few minutes, while Taipei issued warnings to leave over international radio frequencies. China said the flight was a “normal” training mission. Taiwan called it “provocative and irresponsible.” On the other side of the world, officials in Europe saw the maneuver as part of a long-term Chinese plan to salami-slice away Taiwanese control over its territory and, eventually, force its unification with China. EU officials
RSS