The National Judge Act (國民法官法) is to take effect on Jan. 1 next year. Courts across the nation are expected to organize lay judge simulation events before August to prepare for the official start. Notices have been sent to some members of the public to inform them that their names have been drawn to be lay judges.
One of these people, a woman surnamed Chang (張), has received three such notices requiring her to show up for duty at the Taoyuan District Court. Chang is 101 years old, has severe dementia and lives in a care home.
After the first two letters, her daughter sent a letter to the court by registered mail explaining her mother’s situation, and has called to try to speak to somebody directly, but she has received no response. The mother on Wednesday received the third notification, asking her to report to the court on the morning of Aug. 16 to attend the selection procedure for lay judges. Her daughter is understandably exasperated.
I have received such a letter from the Taitung District Court informing me that I had been selected for duty as a lay judge. I was confused, because last year, when I received the preliminary notification for selection, I specifically marked the box that said I did not want to be considered for service.
Why, then, had I subsequently received notification that my name had been listed? Was this an administrative error, or is the system poorly designed?
I do not want to serve as a lay judge because I have no legal expertise, and I do not know what my amateur opinion could add to the process.
Given the nature of Taiwan’s legal system, in which rulings delivered by different judges for the same case differ widely, I have no idea what a lay judge lacking any practical experience in the law could really bring to the party.
Judging a trial requires meticulous attention to the evidence and entails the rights of the people involved in the dispute. It needs people who know what they are doing, and it certainly cannot rely on drawing names out of a hat to decide who should be selected to serve.
I have no intention to be the face of a new policy, and I certainly do not want to be involved if my presence will be more of a hindrance than a help. This is why I indicated that I was not interested in participating in the system.
The Ministry of Justice printed a pamphlet on the lay judge system, complete with answers to frequently asked questions. The answer to the third question — “Can I refuse to be called to serve as a lay judge?” — is: “In principle, you cannot refuse unless you are over 70 years old, are a teacher or a student or have any other extenuating circumstances.”
Should I be unlucky enough to be selected and refuse to participate, would I be arrested or subject to criminal liability? Could I exercise the right to remain silent?
Taiwanese are constitutionally required to pay taxes and complete military service, but must everyone serve as a lay judge? Can the government really force anyone to do that?
Shiao Fu-song is a lecturer at National Taitung University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It