Across Asia and the Pacific, students and parents are breathing a sigh of relief as schools reopen and in-person classes gradually resume. Now comes the reckoning: Failure to make up for students’ significant education losses during the COVID-19 pandemic could diminish their lifetime earning potential and substantially damage economic equity throughout the region.
With the new academic year in many Asian countries starting in a matter of months, governments must urgently mitigate these learning shortfalls by bolstering schools and social safety nets. While many schools offered remote learning during the pandemic, this was a poor substitute for in-person instruction — especially in developing countries.
The Asian Development Bank estimated that students in developing Asia lost more than half a year of effective learning on average.
The costs of doing nothing are steep. If not remedied, students’ lost education is likely to reduce their productivity throughout their working lives and translate into estimated aggregate forgone earnings of US$3.2 trillion in constant 2020 dollars, equivalent to 13 percent of developing Asia’s GDP that year.
Learning losses during the pandemic were not borne evenly, which makes reversing them even more challenging. Girls and students from poorer households struggle disproportionately with remote learning, owing to less access to computers, the Internet, a parent or other adult who can help them and a conducive home study environment.
Moreover, they are often taken out of school in response to economic hardship, which many Asian households experienced during the pandemic.
As a result, estimated learning losses for students from the poorest 20 percent of households in developing Asia are one-third higher than for students from the richest 20 percent, corresponding with a projected 47 percent greater loss of lifetime earnings. Girls are expected to lose 28 percent more than boys in future earnings.
To shrink these disparities and reduce overall losses, the region’s governments need to improve the quality of instruction, make up for learning gaps and support disadvantaged students.
As a first step, ensuring that in-person classes can resume safely, thereby preventing further loss of learning, is vital. This could mean expanding classrooms to enable adequate social distancing, ensuring proper ventilation, installing handwashing and sanitation stations, scheduling meals to avoid crowding and monitoring for COVID-19 symptoms.
Schools that mainly serve low-income students are in greater need of investment to make these improvements and should receive more financial support.
A second step is to use targeted instruction and regular tracking of student progress to offset lost learning.For example, individual mentoring in Bangladesh during the pandemic improved numeracy by 33 percent and English literacy by 52 percent relative to students who did not receive it, and the gains were greater for poor, lagging students with less-educated parents.
Even before COVID-19, randomized controlled trials in Ghana, India and Kenya showed that educational programs matching instruction to individual students’ learning levels — instead of using a uniform, fixed syllabus — significantly improved test scores.
Technology such as MindSpark software can customize content for students and deliver highly effective, individualized teaching. Experience during the pandemic also showed that mobilizing families, communities and volunteers to support education outcomes can speed up children’s learning.
Improving poorer students’ learning opportunities and, hence, life chances also requires narrowing the digital divide. The pandemic has made digital infrastructure even more central to education and communication, and disadvantaged students are more likely to prosper if they have adequate access to the hardware, software and connectivity they need.
Digital literacy campaigns can target girls and governments can work with Internet service providers (ISPs) to offer more affordable access, including by providing subsidies. In Sri Lanka, the government struck a deal with ISPs to give students free access to university-based learning-management systems while schools were closed, increasing higher-education students’ participation rate in online learning to more than 90 percent.
Bolstering social safety nets to encourage school attendance is critical, too. School feeding programs and cash transfers for education expenses can reduce dropout rates among disadvantaged students and encourage those who have stopped attending school to re-enroll. Before the pandemic, a cash transfer program earmarked for girls’ education in Bangladesh increased participants’ schooling by more than three years on average.
Finally, Asian policymakers must build flexibility and emergency resilience into education systems. Disruptions will occur again. Countries must have the capacity to shift to remote schooling on short notice, and everyone — teachers, parents, students and administrators — needs to be prepared.
Innovations in education sparked by pandemic-induced school closures, such as phone mentoring of students, can be blended into the regular curriculum to prepare students for the next break in physical classes.
The choice is clear. Asia can let a generation of students fall further behind and pay the price for lost learning, or it can ensure that all students receive the education they need.
Helping today’s young people realize their potential is the surest path to a more equitable and prosperous region for everyone.
Albert Park is chief economist at the Asian Development Bank.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
With a Taiwan contingency increasingly more plausible, Taiwanese lobbies in Japan are calling for the government to pass a version of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), emulating the US precedent. Such a measure would surely enable Tokyo to make formal and regular contact with Taipei for dialogue, consultation, policy coordination and planning in military security. This would fill the missing link of the trilateral US-Japan-Taiwan security ties, rendering a US military defense of Taiwan more feasible through the support of the US-Japan alliance. Yet, particular caution should be exercised, as Beijing would probably view the move as a serious challenge to
As the Soviet Union was collapsing in the late 1980s and Russia seemed to be starting the process of democratization, 36-year-old US academic Francis Fukuyama had the audacity to assert that the world was at the “end of history.” Fukuyama claimed that democratic systems would become the norm, and peace would prevail the world over. He published a grandiose essay, “The End of History?” in the summer 1989 edition of the journal National Interest. Overnight, Fukuyama became a famous theorist in the US, western Europe, Japan and even Taiwan. Did the collapse of the Soviet Union mark the end of an era as
During a news conference with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo on Monday, US President Joe Biden for the third time intimated that the US would take direct military action to defend Taiwan should China attack. Responding to a question from a reporter — Would Washington be willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan? — Biden replied with an unequivocal “Yes.” As per Biden’s previous deviations from the script of the US’ longstanding policy of “strategic ambiguity” — maintaining a deliberately nebulous position over whether the US would intervene militarily in the event of a conflagration between Taiwan and
Will the US come to the defense of Taiwan if and when China makes its move? Like most friends of Taiwan, I’ve been saying “yes” for a couple decades. But the truth is that none of us, in or out of government, really know. This is precisely why we all need to show humility in our advice on how Taiwan should prepare itself for such an eventuality. After all, it’s their country, and they have no choice but to live with the consequences. A couple weeks ago the New York Times published an article that put this reality in stark relief. As