Across Asia and the Pacific, students and parents are breathing a sigh of relief as schools reopen and in-person classes gradually resume. Now comes the reckoning: Failure to make up for students’ significant education losses during the COVID-19 pandemic could diminish their lifetime earning potential and substantially damage economic equity throughout the region.
With the new academic year in many Asian countries starting in a matter of months, governments must urgently mitigate these learning shortfalls by bolstering schools and social safety nets. While many schools offered remote learning during the pandemic, this was a poor substitute for in-person instruction — especially in developing countries.
The Asian Development Bank estimated that students in developing Asia lost more than half a year of effective learning on average.
The costs of doing nothing are steep. If not remedied, students’ lost education is likely to reduce their productivity throughout their working lives and translate into estimated aggregate forgone earnings of US$3.2 trillion in constant 2020 dollars, equivalent to 13 percent of developing Asia’s GDP that year.
Learning losses during the pandemic were not borne evenly, which makes reversing them even more challenging. Girls and students from poorer households struggle disproportionately with remote learning, owing to less access to computers, the Internet, a parent or other adult who can help them and a conducive home study environment.
Moreover, they are often taken out of school in response to economic hardship, which many Asian households experienced during the pandemic.
As a result, estimated learning losses for students from the poorest 20 percent of households in developing Asia are one-third higher than for students from the richest 20 percent, corresponding with a projected 47 percent greater loss of lifetime earnings. Girls are expected to lose 28 percent more than boys in future earnings.
To shrink these disparities and reduce overall losses, the region’s governments need to improve the quality of instruction, make up for learning gaps and support disadvantaged students.
As a first step, ensuring that in-person classes can resume safely, thereby preventing further loss of learning, is vital. This could mean expanding classrooms to enable adequate social distancing, ensuring proper ventilation, installing handwashing and sanitation stations, scheduling meals to avoid crowding and monitoring for COVID-19 symptoms.
Schools that mainly serve low-income students are in greater need of investment to make these improvements and should receive more financial support.
A second step is to use targeted instruction and regular tracking of student progress to offset lost learning.For example, individual mentoring in Bangladesh during the pandemic improved numeracy by 33 percent and English literacy by 52 percent relative to students who did not receive it, and the gains were greater for poor, lagging students with less-educated parents.
Even before COVID-19, randomized controlled trials in Ghana, India and Kenya showed that educational programs matching instruction to individual students’ learning levels — instead of using a uniform, fixed syllabus — significantly improved test scores.
Technology such as MindSpark software can customize content for students and deliver highly effective, individualized teaching. Experience during the pandemic also showed that mobilizing families, communities and volunteers to support education outcomes can speed up children’s learning.
Improving poorer students’ learning opportunities and, hence, life chances also requires narrowing the digital divide. The pandemic has made digital infrastructure even more central to education and communication, and disadvantaged students are more likely to prosper if they have adequate access to the hardware, software and connectivity they need.
Digital literacy campaigns can target girls and governments can work with Internet service providers (ISPs) to offer more affordable access, including by providing subsidies. In Sri Lanka, the government struck a deal with ISPs to give students free access to university-based learning-management systems while schools were closed, increasing higher-education students’ participation rate in online learning to more than 90 percent.
Bolstering social safety nets to encourage school attendance is critical, too. School feeding programs and cash transfers for education expenses can reduce dropout rates among disadvantaged students and encourage those who have stopped attending school to re-enroll. Before the pandemic, a cash transfer program earmarked for girls’ education in Bangladesh increased participants’ schooling by more than three years on average.
Finally, Asian policymakers must build flexibility and emergency resilience into education systems. Disruptions will occur again. Countries must have the capacity to shift to remote schooling on short notice, and everyone — teachers, parents, students and administrators — needs to be prepared.
Innovations in education sparked by pandemic-induced school closures, such as phone mentoring of students, can be blended into the regular curriculum to prepare students for the next break in physical classes.
The choice is clear. Asia can let a generation of students fall further behind and pay the price for lost learning, or it can ensure that all students receive the education they need.
Helping today’s young people realize their potential is the surest path to a more equitable and prosperous region for everyone.
Albert Park is chief economist at the Asian Development Bank.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS